How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate
Investigative reporter Jennifer Margulis has asked Health Impact News to re-publish a book review she recently wrote, which was published by The Washington Independent Review of Books. She reports that it was among the top five most read reviews for October 2014 which the Washington Independent Review of Books publicized in a second article.
Then the editor pulled the review off their website. Why?
Citing a supposed “conflict of interest” that Margulis states was cleared by the editors prior to publication, Margulis states the real reason she believes it was censored was because:
I “express outrage that newborn infants are routinely vaccinated for hep B” and I wonder why I was encouraged to vaccinate my daughter “against a disease she had no chance of catching.”
Censoring vaccine dangers and safety information is, sadly, common place in the mainstream media. The dangers of these vaccines are well-known, and a matter of public knowledge.
The Department of Justice issues reports on settled cases from the National Vaccine Compensation Program which Health Impact News has published in the past. Here are some of the most recent settlements involving injuries and deaths associated with the hepatitis B vaccine, which is routinely given to newborn infants in almost every hospital across the United States. Read more:






























































