COVID Testing Information

[Health Impact News]

Please Share!

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

by Tyler Durden

Excerpts:

This video provides one of the most erudite and informative looks at Covid-19 and the consequences of lockdowns. As AIER notes, it was remarkable this week to watch as it appeared on YouTube and was forcibly taken down only 2 hours after posting.

In a year of fantastic educational content, this is one of the best we’ve seen.

Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.

Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.

Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.

What likely triggered the Silicon Valley censor-mongers is the fact that a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.” The “Big Pharma” insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.”

Read the full article.

CENSORED: COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Everything We’ve Been Told about COVID is a HOAX!

by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter

Excerpt:

In what should be HEADLINE news coverage in every single major news organization across the globe, the Independent publication “Off-Guardian,” which describes their organization as:

“Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government – OffGuardian was launched in February 2015 and takes its name from the fact its founders had all been censored on and/or banned from the Guardian’s ‘Comment is Free’ sections,”

published an article on Saturday, June 27, 2020, titled:

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose.

We have covered this topic of inaccurate COVID tests previously, of course, and when I first saw this article pop up in my news-feed over the weekend, I made a note to come back and read it in full, expecting that I would find more of the same evidence that we have already published on this topic, that there is no clear evidence that COVID tests are accurate.

Boy was I wrong!

This investigative, highly researched article goes way beyond just pointing out that the evidence is lacking regarding the accuracy of COVID tests currently in the market. They actually prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, that the PCR test which is considered the “gold standard” in COVID testing, is completely “meaningless.”

This must be the most censored information published to date regarding the COVID Plandemic!

We are at WAR, America! And the sooner the sleep-walking public wakes up and starts REFUSING to participate in their own destruction, the sooner we can begin to take our country back.

But to do so, we need to stop fighting each other, and recognize who the REAL enemy is.

Read the full article.

Not a Single COVID-19 Test is FDA Approved – Do We Really Know Who has COVID-19 and Who Does Not?

by Brian Shilhavy

Excerpt:

We are witnessing one of the most extraordinary events in human history, and certainly the most far-reaching and impactful event in all of our lifetimes, because of the effects of what we are being told is a single coronavirus.

The rationale for the extraordinary events we are seeing today all come down to one dataset: the amount of people infected with this coronavirus, and the rate at which people are dying from it.

This can only be justified by one simple fact: we know how to identify and test for this single virus.

If this single fact cannot be proven, or if it is proven to be false, and we really do not have the means to accurately test for this virus, then everything that has transpired as a direct result of trusting the data that this test is based upon, has been built on a faulty foundation that does not exist.

Does this sound like a conspiracy theory? Because if you dare to ask the question, that is what you will be accused of for daring to question the accuracy of the test, and therefore the accuracy of the data that this test allegedly proves.

So let’s start with the facts that most everyone agrees upon, or that can be easily verified.

Read the full article.

Roche CEO: COVID19 Tests “Not Worth Anything – Two of us could do it Overnight in the Garage”

by Brian Shilhavy

Exceprt:

Since the Coronavirus outbreak has started, one of the most controversial topics has surrounded testing.

How does one know if they have the COVID-19 virus? And if someone is sick, or someone dies, is testing “positive” for COVID-19 proof that the person died from it?

But one aspect that is seldom talked about is the accuracy of the tests themselves. When one watches the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media news, they all seem to just assume that these tests are always accurate, and therefore the numbers they publish in terms of those affected or those who die are assumed to be accurate.

This week (April 2020), the CEO of the drug company Roche, Severin Schwan, was quoted in a Reuters’ news article as saying that new antibody tests for COVID-19 were “a disaster.”

Fierce Biotech, one of the trade publications for the pharmaceutical industry, published an article on Schwan’s comments.

The current state of antibody testing for COVID-19 is “a disaster,” said Roche CEO Severin Schwan, as a large number of potentially inaccurate tests enter the market fueled by sky-high demand.

Many countries are seeking serology tests to better understand whether people are developing a possible immunity to the novel coronavirus. But reports detailing high rates of false-positive and false-negative results are delaying widespread screening.

“These tests are not worth anything, or have very little use,” Schwan said during an early Wednesday conference call regarding the company’s first-quarter earnings, according to Reuters.

“Some of these companies, I tell you, this is ethically very questionable to get out with this stuff,” he said, adding that Roche analyzed several products currently on the market and found them to be unreliable.

“Every kind of amateur could produce an antibody test,” he said. “The two of us could do it overnight in the garage.”

Roche is currently developing its own antibody test, set to launch in early May.

Once again, the infighting among pharmaceutical companies to cash in on massive funding for coronavirus products, gives us a glimpse into what is actually happening, if one is willing to turn off their TV long enough to search other sources of information.

There is massive money being spent on COVID-19 testing, and these “antibody” tests are the next new round of products Big Pharma wants to cash in on.

Antibody testing allows one to theoretically see who may have had the Coronavirus but have now recovered from illness caused by COVID-19, where a person’s own immune system has developed antibodies to fight against it.

Such knowledge is key to developing new drugs, including vaccines.

But it is also a double-edged sword for the pharmaceutical industry, because if many people test positive for antibodies with no apparent illness or actual COVID-19 virus present, then it could drastically reduce the death rates that have been reported, and also lower the cost-to-risk ratio for pharmaceutical companies to develop these products if the general public is developing antibodies without the help of pharmaceutical products.

That is exactly what is apparently happening in New York, where the public has been told that the death rate from COVID-19 in New York has been around 7.4%.

But Governor Cuomo has just released results from the State’s first round of antibody testing, and he is reporting that based on these results, the actual death rate is much lower, less than 1%.

Read the full article.

FAIL: The Exact Same COVID Test will Produce Different Results Depending on the Laboratory

by Jon Rappoport

Excerpt:

In previous articles, I’ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive.

Here I discuss yet another reason: the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated. Different labs come up with different results.

In essence, the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources, to the government, and then to the public, is narrowed, and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH.

In the case of the PCR test, that’s what is happening.

Read the full article.

Are the COVID Tests a Way to Surreptitiously Infect or Implant People?

by Makia Freeman

Excerpt:

Now that the public is starting to wake up to the fact that people leading the COVID response are MASS MURDERERS responsible for millions of deaths due to censoring life-saving information from thousands of doctors who are treating COVID patients with a 100% success rate, it is time to start questioning EVERYTHING they are asking the public to comply with.

What are their true motives, since they obviously do NOT value human life?

Makia Freeman from The Freedom Articles published a very interesting article this past week, raising serious questions about the PCR tests, which we have already reported are not reliable, and why the cotton swabs have to be so long? Makia writes:

“We need to ask ourselves whether these COVID tests are in fact a clever way to gain secret access to the inside of our bodies, especially our brains.

The nasal swabs being used (called nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal) are incredibly long (around 6 inches or 15 cm) which means they reach to the very back of our throats. Is there any medical reason why the swabs must be this length?

In human anatomy, the cribriform plate is a midline bone important as part both of the cranium and of the nose which transmits the olfactory nerves that carry the sense of smell. It is a very delicate and fragile part of the body.

Why on earth do the COVID tests contain a swab (a padded stick) which can poke and prod this delicate bone? Could it be because the cribriform plate allows access to the brain?

Could these COVID tests be used to surreptitiously infect people (with some disease-causing agent), deliver the vaccine (which they claim they are still developing) or even implant people (with nanotechnology such as microchips)?”

I asked a retired medical doctor who is known to Health Impact News about what Makia was saying here regarding the need for long cotton swabs penetrating so far into the body, and this doctor replied:

“There is no valid reason for swabbing the naso-pharynx so deeply that it causes pain and injury to the extreme back and roof  of the nose. Whatever microorganisms are there are distributed throughout the entire nose and throat.

They are supposedly easily communicated by a sneeze, hence the ‘need’ for masks.. You don’t have to go digging for them. You could even blow your nose into a tissue and that would be a sufficient sample to culture.”

There is something highly suspicious about these COVID tests.

Read the full article.

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

by GreatGameIndia.com

Excerpt:

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:

if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.

Read the full article.

German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

by Ben Swann

Excerpt:

We have previously published the work of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an attorney based out of Germany. In an interview last month, October, 2020, Dr. Fuellmich stated that those behind what he refers to as the “Corona Scandal” have committed crimes against humanity, and that those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages.

Dr. Fuellmich was recently interviewed by journalist Ben Swann of RT.com to discuss his latest lawsuit against the Facebook “FactCheckers.”

This is a defamation lawsuit, since Dr. Fuellmich works with many scientists and doctors in Europe who have been censored because they do not promote the Globalists’ narrative on COVID. This includes the doctor we featured in yesterday’s newsletter, Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former Pfizer Chief Science Officer.

The plaintiff in Dr. Fuellmich’s lawsuit against the FactCheckers is Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who 12 years ago exposed the fraud behind the “Swine Flu.” He was a member of the German Parliament at the time, as well as a member of the Council of Europe.

Today, Dr. Wodarg’s criticisms of the PCR tests which are being used to lockdown the world over COVID, are being censored by these “FactCheckers.”

So Dr. Fuellmich believes that their lawsuit against these “FactCheckers” will put the burden of proof on them to prove that the PCR test is accurate, and that this lawsuit can then be used as a template for similar lawsuits in other countries around the world.

Read the full article.