Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The biggest lie that has been perpetrated in modern medicine is that “the science is settled” when it comes to the issue of vaccines, and that all vaccines are “safe and effective.”

We have been exposing this lie for over a decade now, combating the lies with REAL data and truth, such as comparing the health outcomes of children whose parents followed the CDC vaccine schedule and injected their children with all the recommended vaccines, with those parents who decided to not vaccinate their children.

This is, by far, the most scientific way to determine if vaccines, ANY vaccine, is “safe and effective.” But such studies have never been conducted by the federal government and their alphabet “health” agencies such as the FDA, CDC, NIH, etc.

And when others privately conduct such studies, these federal bureaucratic medical tyrants do everything they can to discredit and vilify those conducting such studies, to prevent the public from having this information.

Here are some previous articles we have published on this topic:

Study: Unvaccinated Children Healthier Than Vaccinated Kids – Doctors Agree

Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker?

Families who suffer from vaccine injuries to their children, and as a result then decide to not vaccinate future children that they have, also become homes in which the health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children can be observed.

Banned Videos of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Restored on Health Impact News

So it should not surprise us at all that the current medical authorities have no desire whatsoever to compare the health outcomes of people who have been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines with those who have not.

This is information that they do NOT want to be disseminated to the public.

Steve Kirsch has just published a very revealing article about two groups of people he has studied that contain both people vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines and those who were not, comprising a sample of about 800 people, 200 of which attended a wedding about 8 months ago, and about 600 people who responded to a survey he published.

The results of his analysis:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

It is this kind of data the CDC and FDA do NOT want disseminated to the public, and is being heavily censored.

You are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die if you get the COVID shot

When you combine this result with negative vaccine efficacy, the COVID shots are completely nonsensical. Nobody should take them. We couldn’t find a single supportive anecdote!

by Steve Kirsch
Substack

Executive summary

I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.

I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”

A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier. And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.

This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.

Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die

expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.

I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).

An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Government which is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.

And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.

When you combine this with the evidence of negative vaccine efficacy (VE), such as this article on San Diego by my good friend Mathew Crawford, we are left with the inevitable conclusion that there isn’t any benefit at all in any dimension to support the use of the COVID “vaccines.”

You are 25X More Likely to be Injured and 20X more Likely to Die if you get the COVID Shot

You are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die if you get the COVID shot

Executive summary

Over 12 MILLION Views!

COVID-19 “Vaccine” Casualties List

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

We Are Now on Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

One Comment

Join the DiscussionCancel reply

Top Stories This Week