Nurse of 30 years retires after seeing newborn babies harmed by vaccines.
Another Nurse Whistleblower Confirms: Routine NICU Vaccine Injury Happening
by Jefferey Jaxen
Health Impact News
There is a quickening happening within the establishment medical community. An awakening that is challenging an unthinking, business as usual atmosphere.
Many within mainstream US medicine are arriving at the painful realization that their job is often to follow unethical orders and push the products of a monopolistic pharmaceutical industry.
The Military Tribunal judges hearing the Doctors Trial in Nuremberg Germany after WWII. From left to right are Harold L. Sebring, Walter B. Beals, Johnson T. Crawford, and Victor C. Swearingen. Twenty of the 23 defendants were medical doctors, and were accused of having been involved in Nazi human experimentation and mass murder, violating basic human rights of informed medical consent. Of the 23 defendants, seven were acquitted and seven received death sentences; the remainder received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. Image source.
The individuals stuck within such a system are faced with two choices. First, they can unconsciously obey their superiors or employers — and in doing so — become part of a Nuremberg-style lineage of people “just following orders.” The other option is to whistleblow, to disobey orders, or to simply walk away from an abusive, broken system. For those individuals choosing option two, a comfortable life can never be promised, yet an intact conscience and soul will be theirs to keep forever.
The breakthrough success and unique phenomenon of the documentary film Vaxxed From Cover-Up to Catastrophe continues to make history. The popularity of the film is a daily reminder that government oversight and regulatory agencies have failed the American people.
The Vaxxed Bus — tirelessly touring cities since the film’s release — is a daily reminder that the mainstream media has failed in their duties at best, or willfully covered up the crime of the century at worst. With each city the bus visits, the Vaxxed team is doing the muckracking, gumshoe investigative journalism that once was the backbone of American investigative journalism.
Crimes Being Committed in Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Within the realm of the vaccine industry, there are many tragic stories and underreported bombshells waiting to be spotlighted. One such narrative, hiding in plain sight, is the routine vaccine injury happening in hospital neonatal intensive care units (NICU) across the US. The ongoing events were first brought to the public’s attention by nurse whistleblower Michelle Rowton of Nurses Against Mandatory Vaccines on May 1, 2015. In an interview with infowars.com, Rowton revealed the following bombshell information:
I’ve sat in a room with our on-call staff of physicians and practitioners (when they say) “Oh wow, this is so embarrassing this 25 weeker never actually required a breathing tube and going on the vent after he was born, he was so strong. But we gave him his two month vaccinations and he got intubated last night ha ha, oops how embarrassing. The step-down units are calling the NICU’s and saying “hey we’re going to go ahead and give these four babies their two month shots today, make sure you have beds ready because we all know they’re going to have increased breathing difficulties, feeding and digestion difficulties, apnea, and bradycardia. This is what goes on.
The practice of expediency and strict adherence to a questionable vaccine schedule put forward by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — “a troubled agency” in the words of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. — is creating untold human injury and suffering.
Three months after Rowten’s whistleblowing admissions, new research from the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics journal titled Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants confirmed essentially 100 percent of Rowton’s whistleblowing statements which at the time seemed almost surreal. The Pediatrics study, comprised of 13,926 infants, concluded:
All ELBW [extremely low-birth-weight] infants in the NICU had an increased incidence of sepsis evaluations and increased respiratory support and intubation after routine immunization.
The back to back revelations sent shockwaves through the alternative medical community and strengthened the case for immediate investigations, yet none happened at the government, hospital, or corporate media levels.
It was [pharmaceutical] business as usual until another nurse whistleblower came forward and was filmed by the Vaxxed Bus team in Redding, California on January 12, 2017. This new whistleblower nurse, named Joanne, stated that she decided to retire early because she could no longer be a part of the routine damage she was seeing in her NICU. Joanne stated:
The micro preemies can be born as much as four months early; two months they get their vaccines. We see them go off on their feeds, lethargic, fevers and it sets them back…and I don’t want to be a part of that anymore.
Both whistleblowing nurses and a respected medical journal stated that at the two month marker, when some of the NICU infants should still be in their mother’s womb, the six CDC-mandated vaccines rapidly degrade the health of the infants. The current program of vaccinating every newborn at birth and with another round of vaccines at two months does not take into account the severely underdeveloped and vulnerable preemies. In addition, the combined toxic adjuvant load upon a premature infant’s body is being confirmed to cause a range of physiological challenges simply ignored by the current US medical system.
A quick look at the group of vaccines given at birth and two months reveal fraudulent approval studies and raise red flags.
The Hepatitis B vaccine, the IPV vaccine, and the HIB vaccine show purposely skewed research during each respected vaccine’s approval trial. Each vaccine trial was set up, not with a vaccinated versus a non-vaccinated or placebo control group, but with a control group that received either one or multiple vaccines.
The outcome of this perplexing study design casts the single vaccine group awaiting approval in a positive light by allowing the pharmaceutical company to claim that their vaccine causes no more adverse reactions than the multi-vaccine ‘control’ group.
Putting aside the research fraud and flawed study designs that haunt many vaccine trials, there has never been a safety study conducted to show that combining all the vaccines recommended by the CDC from zero to two months is safe. In fact, the CDC’s own report found that mixed exposures to chemical substances and other stress factors may produce “increased or unexpected deleterious health effects.”
The same CDC report also noted that:
“exposures to mixed stressors can produce health consequences that are additive, synergistic, antagonistic, or can potentiate the response expected from individual component exposures.”
In the (willful) absence of proper vaccine studies confirming safety, the public must rely on the continued alarms raised by the nurses on the front lines who are seeing the injuries.
How long will the US medical system continue to sweep these daily NICU vaccine injuries under the rug to save face for their hospitals and the larger CDC-pharmaceutical complex? How long will doctors and nurses continue to follow orders against the established medical ethics of “do no harm”?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
US Government Sponsored Medical Research Designed to Kill Babies
4,500 Premature Babies Sought as Guinea Pigs in NIH Experiments
Premature Babies, Targets of Unethical Experimentation
NIH Continuing to Experiment on Premature Babies without Parental Knowledge of Risks
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
