Here Comes the 21st Century Cures Act: Say Goodbye to Vaccine Safety Science

by Barbara Loe Fisher

It has only been a few weeks since the forced vaccination lobby rammed a bill (SB 277) through the California legislature eliminating the personal belief vaccine exemption so children will have to get dozens of doses of federally recommended vaccines or be denied a school education.1 While California was being subjected to one of the most aggressive and expensive state lobbying campaigns2 ever mounted by the pharmaceutical industry in partnership with medical trade associations funded by industry and government3 4 5 6 that same lobby was pulling an even bigger fast one on the American people in Washington, D.C.

Here comes the 21st Century Cures Act,7 which is a Pharma-driven bill8 blessed by the FDA9 that seriously compromises the integrity of the FDA drug and vaccine licensing process. 10 The 362-page bill sailed through the U.S. House of Representatives on July 10, 201511and mandates that about $9 billion dollars be given to NIH to develop more drugs and vaccines and $550 million be given to the FDA to fast track products to market.12

21st Century Cures Act Eliminates Good Vaccine Safety Science

Bill Lowers FDA Licensing Standards

The bill allows the FDA to lower licensing standards for testing of experimental drugs, medical devices and “biological products” – a category that includes vaccines –13 14 15 so companies will no longer be required to conduct large, case controlled clinical trials 16 17 18 to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Instead, FDA can accept novel statistical analyses 19 and “clinical experience,”20 such as anecdotal evidence from patients.21

It is interesting that clinical experience and anecdotal evidence will constitute “good science” for the purpose of demonstrating a vaccine is safe before it is licensed, while clinical experience and anecdotal evidence has never been good enough to demonstrate that a vaccine is unsafe after it is licensed.22 23 24 25

Greasing Skids to License Drugs and Vaccines

The 21st Century Cures Act is being sold as a way for the FDA to quickly license experimental pharmaceutical products for people suffering with rare or life threatening diseases, whether or not those products have been adequately tested.26 However, greasing the FDA licensure skids to make experimental drugs available for the sick and dying, who voluntarily choose to use them, is one thing, while greasing the skids to bum rush experimental vaccines to licensure that government will legally require healthy children and adults to buy and use, is something quite different.27 28 29 30 31

Nearly every single vaccine that the pharmaceutical industry creates and the FDA licenses for child use is eventually recommended for all children and mandated by state governments for daycare and school entry.32 33 34 35 36 

And, now, many adults are being brought into the vaccine mandate net as well.37 38 39

Sick in bed

Ensuring Drugs & Vaccines Dominate U.S. Health Care

Coming on the heels of the Affordable Health Care Act,40 which guaranteed that the pharmaceutical industry and their products will continue to dominate the most expensive health care system in the world,41 42 43 44 45 46 there are so many breathtaking ways the 21st Century Cures Act will endanger the public health that it is hard to know where to begin. The word “vaccines” is not being publicly uttered by anyone sponsoring the bill. However, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), which represents more than 1,500 pharmaceutical and other health product corporations, is already crowing about how they managed to influence Capitol Hill politicians to incorporate the “Vaccine Access, Certainty and Innovation Act of 2015” into the 21st Century Cures Act.47 48

Read NVIC’s press release by clicking the image to the right.


NVIC Press Realease - 21st Century Cures

Faster Track for Vaccines You Will Have To Take in Future

So, if the Senate approves and the President signs this life-threatening bill into law by the end of this year, what will happen to the hundreds of experimental vaccines that will be fast tracked to licensure and mandated for you and your children to get in the future? Just so you know, that list includes vaccines for HIV/AIDS,49 50 51 chlamydia,52 cytomegalovirus,53 hepatitis C,54genital herpes,55 syphilis,56 gonorrhea,57 e-coli,58 norovirus,59 tuberculosis60and many, many more.61 62

Gutting Informed Consent Along with Science

First, the 21st Century Cures Act allows the FDA to expedite licensure63 64 of new vaccines and expand uses for existing vaccines65 based on:

  1. Shorter or smaller clinical trials; and
  2. non-traditional or adaptive trial designs and Bayesian methods of data analysis;66 and
  3. evidence from clinical experience instead of randomized, controlled clinical trials;67 68 and
  4. use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoint measures69 rather than actual clinical endpoints proving effectiveness.70

Second, the new law would allow researchers to conduct “clinical testing” of experimental pharmaceutical products on people without first obtaining their informed consent71 72 73 if “the proposed clinical testing poses no more then minimal risk.”74 75 It is not clear who decides what constitutes “minimal risk,” but presumably that will be left up to industry and government officials. It is also not clear whether minor children can be enrolled in experiments without the informed consent of their parents.

Vaccines and guessing

Using “Best Guess” Statistics Instead of Good Science

Just for fun, I looked up the definition of Bayesian to see what will happen if the FDA lets drug companies use that method instead of large randomized clinical trials76 77 78 79 80 to determine whether an experimental vaccine is safe or not. Here is what the dictionary says about Bayesian:

“Being, relating to, or involving statistical methods that assign probabilities or distributions to events or parameters based on experience or best guesses before experimentation and data collection and that apply Bayes’ theorem to revise the probabilities and distributions after obtaining experimental data.”81

The key phrase to focus on is “based on experience or best guesses before experimentation or data collection.” While we know federal agencies have been guessing for a long time when it comes to pronouncing vaccines safe and effective due to long standing gaps in vaccine safety science,82 83 84 85 86 it is irresponsible for Congress to bow to Big Pharma and codify into law the legal right for FDA officials to use flimsy “best guess” statistical methods and unreliable surrogate endpoints to support claims that a new vaccine is safe and really works, instead of requiring vaccine manufacturers to conduct in-depth biological mechanism research and large, well-designed clinical trials.

Moving numbers around in a computer is a poor substitute for actually proving an experimental vaccine does not kill and injure real human beings before it is licensed.

Congress and Pharma: Friends with Benefits

In 1986, Congress allowed itself to be blackmailed by the pharmaceutical industry and removed most civil product liability from vaccine manufacturers87 and, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declared vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe” and completely removed all product liability from FDA licensed vaccines88 89 90 In America, nobody can sue drug companies when FDA licensed vaccines injure and kill people.

Not satisfied with a total product liability shield and with access to billions of dollars in American taxpayer money to build new vaccine plants91 92 93 and create hundreds of new vaccines,94 95 96 while getting government-paid free advertising97 and enjoying a predictable market from “no exceptions” vaccine mandates, the pharmaceutical industry is now insisting that Congress give them a free pass on the science, too.

Justice

A Consumer’s Worst Nightmare

The financial public private partnership that Congress has directed government to forge with industry through a series of federal laws created over the past 30 years,98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 is a drug company stockholder’s dream and a consumer’s worst nightmare. That lucrative partnership, which is using the “greater good” club to violate the human and civil rights of the American people in the name of a highly politicized “War on Disease,” has the potential to destroy more lives than any war our nation has ever fought.

The 21st Century Cures Act is a prescription for disaster. Vaccine research, development and fast tracking should not be a part of it.

Act Now

If you want to make your U.S. Senator and Representative aware of what you think of the 21st Century Cures Act, become a user of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal. The Portal can put you in immediate electronic contact with the people you elected to represent you in Washington, D.C. so you can politely, of course, give them a piece of your mind.

Stand up for your right to know and freedom to choose.

It’s your health. Your family. Your choice.

Join www.nvicadvocacy.org

Read the full article here.

Comment on this article on VaccineImpact.com


3 Biocom. Membership List 2015 that includes Pfizer, Merck, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Monsanto, Kaiser Permanente and support for state legislation of interest (SB 277).
6California Medical Association. California Medical Association Foundation corporate sponsors include Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Lilly and Kaiser Permanente.
7 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act (July 2, 2015).
9 Woodcock J. 21st Century Cures: Modernizing Clinical Trials and Incorporating Patient Perspective. Testimony for Subcommitee on Health, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives July 11, 2014.
10 Hodsden S. 21st Century Cures Act Set to Overhaul FDA Regulatory Process. MedDevice Online July 10, 2015.
12 Ross S. House overwhelmingly passes 21st Century Cures Act. Modern Healthcare July 10, 2015.
13 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. 42USC262. Sec. 262. Regulation of Biological Products. (i) Biological product defined.The term ”biological product” means a virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin, vaccine, blood, blood component or derivative, allergenic product… applicable to the prevention, treatment, or cure of a disease or condition of human beings.
14 U.S. Public Health Service Act. Part F – Licensing- Biological Products and Clinical Laboratories. Subpart 1 – Regulation of Biological Products. Sec. 351,Pg. 282. The term “biological product” means a virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin, vaccine, blood, blood component or derivative, protein….”.
15 H.R. 6 – The 21st Century Cures Act. (2) Use of a Drug Development Tool (A) and (B). Pg. 80. July 2, 2015.
16 Kabesch M, Ruckes C, Seibert-Grafe M, Blettner M. Randomized Controlled Trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108 (39): 663-668.
18 Clinicaltrials.gov. Vaccine Clinical Trials.
19 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Subtitle D – Modern Trial Design and Evidence Development. Broader Application of Bayesian Statistics and Adaptive Trial Designs. Pg. 97-98. July 2, 2015.
20 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Sec. 2062. Utilizing Evidence from Clinical Experience. Pg. 100-101. July 2, 2015.
23 Tomlijenovic L, Shaw CA. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: are they at odds? Annals of Medicine 2013; 45(2): 182-193.
24 Goldman A. Scientific consensus finds the HPV vaccine safe. Women’s Health Dec. 6, 2013.
25 English K. Public editor criticizes the Star’s Gardasil story. The Star Feb. 13, 2015.
28 Zimm A, Preston D. Merck Gets First U.S. Cancer-Shot Mandate, From Texas. Bloomberg News Feb. 2, 2007.
29 Gardner A. Drugmaker Assists in Pushing for Mandate for HPV Vaccination. Washington Post Feb. 11, 2007.
30 Immunization Act Coalition. HPV Vaccine Mandates for Children in Secondary Schools. Feb. 2, 2015.
31 National Conference of State Legislatures. HPV Vaccine Legislation (2006-2015). June 2015.
33 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).Policy Statement – Increasing Immunization Coverage. Pediatrics 2010; 125(6): 1295-1304.
38 Fisher, BL. Women, Vaccines & Bodily IntegrityNVIC Newsletter Jan. 14, 2013.
41 Hamburger T. Obama gives a powerful drug lobby a seat at healthcare table. Los Angeles Times Aug. 4, 2009.
46 Tan LJ. Vaccine Financing, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Immunizations. National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit May 12, 2015.
49 National Institutes of Health (NIH). HIV Vaccine Research. NIAID June 8, 2015.
52 Harvard Medical School. Safeguarding against chlamydia: vaccine generates double protection in animals. Science Daily June 18, 2015.
53 University of California – Davis Health System. Novel vaccine approach to human cytomegalovirus found effective.Science Daily Sept. 18, 2013.
55 NIH. NIH launches trial of investigative genital herpes vaccine. NIAID Press Release Nov. 8, 2013.
56 Cameron CE, Lukehart SA. Current status of syphilis vaccine development: Need, challenges, prospects.Vaccine 2014; 32(14): 1602-1609.
57 Zhu W, Chen CJ, Thomas CE et al. Vaccines for Gonorrhea: Can We Rise to the Challenge?Frontiers in Microbiology 2011; 2(124).
58 Michigan State University. Vaccine Developed for E.Coli Diarrheal Diseases That Kill Millions of Children.Science Daily Apr. 14, 2009.
60 Fletcher HA, Hawkridge T, McShane H. A New Vaccine for Tuberculosis: The Challenges, Development and Deployment.Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2009; 6(2): 219-228.
61 Fisher BL. Vaccination Costs Increasing. Reforming Vaccine Policy & Law: A Guide.National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) 2014.
62 Fisher BL. Many New Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines Coming Soon. Pg. 11. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding and Transmission. National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) 2014.
63 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Sec. 592. Precision Medicine Regarding Orphan Drug and Expedited Approval Programs. Pg. 95-96. July 2, 2015.
64 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Sec. 2063. Streamlined Data Review Program. Pg. 107-108. July 2, 2015.
66 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Subtitle D – Modern Trial Design and Evidence Development. Broader Application of Bayesian Statistics and Adaptive Trial Designs. Pg. 97-98. July 2, 2015.
67 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Sec. 2062. Utilizing Evidence from Clinical Experience. Pg. 100-101. July 2, 2015.
69 Hudgens NG, Gilbert PB, Self SG. Endpoints in vaccine trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2004; 13: 1-26.
70 U.S. House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act. Sec. 2021. Qualifications and Use of Drug Development Tool. (9) Surrogate Endpoint (A) and (B). Pg. 86. July 2, 2015.
72 Fisher BL. The Moral Right to Conscientious, Philosophical and Personal Belief Exemption to Vaccination. Presentation to National Vaccine Advisory Committee May 2, 1997.
73 Nir E. Informed Consent. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011 (Fall Edition).
75 Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. The 21st Century Cures Act – Will It Take Us Back in Time?N Engl J Med 2015; 372(26): 2473-2475.
76 Jefferson T. Influenza vaccination: policy versus evidence. BMJ 2006; 333(7574): 912-915.
78 Osterholm M, Kelley NS et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet 2012; 12(1): 36-44.
79 Every-Palmer S, Howick J. How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2014; 908-914.
80 Greenhaugh T, Howich J, Maskrey N. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?BMJ 2014; 348.
81 Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Definition of Bayesian.
82 Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Committee. Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines: Executive Summary, Research Needs (p. 8) and Afterword on Research Needs (p. 206-207). Washington, DC. National Academy Press 1991.
83 Institute of Medicine Vaccine Safety Committee. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality: Need for Research and Surveillance (p. 305-308). Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 1994.
85 Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Adverse Effects of Vaccines. Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality: Evaluating Biological Mechanisms of Adverse Events (p. 57-102), Increased Susceptibility (p. 82), and Concluding Comments (p. 629-632).  Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2012.
86 Institute of Medicine Committee on the Assessment of Studies of Health Outcomes Related to the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule. The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence and Future Studies: Summary: Health Outcomes (p. 5-6) and Conclusions About Scientific Findings (p. 11) and Review of Scientific Findings (p. 75-98). Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2013.
87 Fisher BL. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Failed Experiment in Tort Reform? Presented to Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines Nov. 18, 2008.
88 Holland MS, Krakow RJ. Brief of Amici Curiae National Vaccine Information Center, Its Co-Founders and 24 other organizations in support of petitioners. In: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth filed with Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 2010.
89 Supreme Court of the United States. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth No. 09-152. Justice Sotomayor with whom Justice Ginsberg joins, dissenting Feb. 22, 2011.
91 Homeland Security News Wire. Sanofi Pasteur to open new flu vaccine plant. Aug. 14, 2007.
92 Palmer E. GSK gets OK for $91M vaccine plant with Texas A&M. Fierce Pharma Manufacturing Mar. 27, 2013.
94 NIH. NIH funding development of three biodefense vaccines. NIAID Press Release Oct. 7, 2010.
98 1984 Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act. What is Hatch-Waxman Act?Regulatory One Dec. 30, 2011.
100 1992 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). The Prescription Drug User Fee Act: Structure and Reauthorization Issues.Congressional Research Service Oct. 7, 2002.
101 Barlas S. Pharmacy Group Wants to Change the FDA’s REMS Authority. Pharmacy & Therapeutics 2012; 37(1): 39-40.
102 1997 FDA Modernization Act. FDA Modernization Act of 1997 – The Provisions.Congressional Research Service Mar. 13, 1998.
103 2004 Project Bioshield Act. Impact of Public Law 108-276. Office of Legislative Policy and Analysis.

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm

dr_andrew_moulden_every_vaccine_produces_harm

eBook – Available for immediate download.

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

Read:

Read Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm on your mobile device!

on your mobile device!

$3.99

Kindle Logo

 

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

Medical_Doctors_Opposed_to_Forced_Vaccinations_Should_Their_Views_be_Silence_sm

eBook – Available for immediate download.

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this eBook, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.

Read:

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

on your mobile device!

$0.99

kindle-logo-sm (1)