Trouble in MAGA Land? Marjorie Taylor Greene Claims Taxpayer Funds Used to Silence Victims of Sexual Abuse so “Epstein files, tapes, recordings, witness interviews” Never See the Light of Day

In one of my editions of SWAMP WATCH last week, I reported that Florida Representative Matt Gaetz was appointed to be the next U.S. Attorney General, and that he resigned from Congress the same day, which meant that an ethics report regarding his sexual conduct with minors that was due to be published in the House would no longer be published, because he resigned from Congress. Gaetz was also previously being investigated by the Department of Justice for the same thing, so Gaetz, if appointed, would oversee the very agency, the DOJ, that was investigating him. I had a couple of angry MAGA people email me, claiming that Gaetz was innocent and the victim of his enemies regarding such allegations, and criticizing me for publishing this. I always find it somewhat amusing when these MAGA cult members email me in a condescending tone, claiming that they know the "truth" while I am obviously ignorant of these matters. Do they know Matt Gaetz personally? How do they know that Gaetz is innocent of these charges? The thing is though, none of these people who chastised me mentioned the fact that Gaetz resigned from the House before this ethics committee report was released. This begs the question, if he is so innocent and has nothing to hide, why didn't he let the report come out and exonerate him before resigning? If he is appointed as head of the DOJ, he won't start work until January, after all. This MAGA "reasoning" also ignores the fact that the House of Representatives is not made up of "liberal democrats" who hate Gaetz and are his enemies. The House is controlled by Republicans, most of them full on board with the MAGA agenda, including Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, who has said that releasing the ethics report on Gaetz after he already resigned, would set a "dangerous precedent." "Dangerous" for whom? Well, today it is being reported that Congresswoman Majorie Taylor Greene, who can hardly be labeled as an "enemy" of the MAGA movement, or even an enemy of Matt Gaetz, has joined in with other Republicans who think that not only should the ethics report on Gaetz be released, but that a whole lot of other things should be revealed to the public because "there’s other lawmakers with skeletons in their closet", and that her Republican colleagues in Congress have covered up “sexual harassment and assault claims” by paying off victims with taxpayer money.

Will Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Matt Gaetz Appointments be Approved by the U.S. Senate?

President elect Donald Trump has announced that Florida Representative Matt Gaetz is appointed to be the next U.S. Attorney General, and that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is appointed to the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services, making these two appointments his most controversial appointments yet. Matt Gaetz has been under investigation for child sex trafficking in the House of Representatives, and he promptly resigned from the House as soon as Trump appointed him as the AG, just days before a House ethics committee was due to release their findings. Pam Martens of Wall Street on Parade reported today that Gaetz has previously been under investigation for child sex trafficking by the Department of Justice (DOJ), which then suddenly dropped the case without explanation. The DOJ is being sued by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), for failing to honor their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to find out what they had on Gaetz. Gaetz, if appointed, would oversee the very agency, the DOJ, that was investigating him. How convenient. Much to the pleasure of the MAGA crowd, Trump announced that he was appointing Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to the position of Secretary of HHS. This surprised many Republicans who are skeptical of Kennedy, due to his "anti-vaccine" claims, even though Kennedy has worked hard trying to convince everyone that he is NOT anti-vaccine, but pro-vaccine. Was AIPAC behind this appointment? Will Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s pro Zionist views, as well as the history of the Kennedy family, including his father, being pro-Israel Zionists help him with this appointment?