Why are the Nation’s Pharmacies and Retail Outlets Refusing to Give the New FDA-Authorized COVID Shots to Babies?

Florida’s largest private employer, Publix Food & Pharmacy, announced yesterday that they would NOT be giving the new FDA-authorized COVID vaccines to babies and toddlers between 6 months old and 4 years old. The Tampa Bay Times reports: "Since COVID-19 vaccines first became available, Publix has played a major role in tackling the public health emergency in Florida by offering vaccines to adults and, later, children as young as 5. But the Lakeland grocery company says it will not offer the vaccine approved for children ages 4 and under 'at this time.' Spokesperson Hannah Herring said Tuesday that Publix will not release a statement explaining its decision." Apparently Publix is not the only retail outlet in Florida refusing to inject babies with the toxic COVID shots. Brianna Andrews, writing in Jacksonville for News4Jax, reports: "Children under 5 years old are now eligible for COVID-19 vaccines, but some local parents say they are struggling to find appointments to get them. News4JAX called a dozen local pharmacies in the area, and none of them offered the vaccine for children under 5. They told us they did not intend to." And while this hesitancy to inject babies with COVID experimental shots is at least somewhat understandable in Florida, where the State announced they were not supplying the shots through the Health Department, national retail outlets are also seemingly hesitant to inject babies and infants. According to an article published on Axios yesterday, Walgreens, Costco, Rite Aid, Walmart, H-E-B, Hy-Vee, and Wegmans are only offering the shots to 3 and 4-year-olds, but not 6 months old through 2. CVS offers the shots for children as young as 1.5 years old, but apparently not babies younger than that. Why are these retail outlets refusing to inject the babies now that they are authorized by the FDA? Publix refused to explain their decision, suggesting that this is a legal can of worms. Hospitals are apparently the only ones injecting the babies. Is it because they have Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) to handle the casualties, while retail outlets do not?

US Naval Air Forces Orders “Safety Pause” For Aircraft After Multiple Deadly Southern California Crashes

The U.S. Navy announced this weekend that there would be a "safety pause" for certain aircraft following 3 recent crashes in Southern California where 6 service members died within the span of 10 days. I have read several reports from multiple sources regarding this "safety pause," and not one of them mentioned the vaccination status of the pilots, and there is no indication that the investigations will consider if any adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines could have been involved. The Navy currently has 97% of its service members vaccinated with mandatory COVID-19 vaccines. American Airlines pilot Captain Robert Snow, a pilot with over 31 years experience, made headlines recently when he went public with his story after going into cardiac arrest in the cockpit of the commercial plane he was flying just moments after landing in Dallas, avoiding what could have been a major catastrophe if he would have suffered his heart attack while landing. His career is over now, as the FAA will not allow pilots with heart conditions like Mr. Snow now has to continue flying. Mr. Snow went public to explain how this was most certainly a COVID vaccine adverse reaction, and his testimony was quickly removed from Google’s YouTube. Mr. Snow was mandated to receive the COVID vaccine as a condition for keeping his job. Pilot Joshua Yoder, who is the co-founder of the U.S. Freedom Flyers, was interviewed by Steve Kirsch where he revealed that he was receiving many phone calls from other pilots in the commercial airline industry who are also suffering heart problems after receiving a COVID-19 mandatory vaccine, but they fear coming forward because they will lose their jobs.

7,500% Increase in Recorded Cases of Cancer Following COVID-19 Vaccines

Dr. Ryan Cole was recently interviewed by Maria Zeee where he stated that he is getting reports all across the world from doctors observing that cancer rates are "taking off like wild fire" following COVID-19 vaccinations. A recently published study in the Journal "Food and Chemical Toxicology," also linked mRNA vaccines to an increase in cancers. I spent some time today searching through the U.S. Government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) for data on cancer following vaccines. Cancer is not a common side effect associated with vaccine injuries, perhaps due to the time it takes for cancer cells to proliferate and be exposed through cancer screening, as by then most people would probably not even associate a diagnosis of cancer with a previous vaccine. Therefore, even though previous analyses on COVID-19 vaccine injuries have shown that the unreported factor is about 41x, it could be significantly higher for cases of cancer. To find trends of increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines, we need to compare these rates with previous FDA approved vaccines in VAERS. Searching for various forms of cancer in VAERS, I found 739 cases resulting in 84 deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations for the past 16 months. Using the exact same search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 years before the COVID-19 shots were issued emergency use authorizations, I found 220 cases resulting in 16 deaths over 360 months. That's an average of .6 cases per month for the previous 30 years compared to an average of 46 cases of cancer per month following COVID-19 vaccines, an increase of 7,567%. The CDC and FDA have not issued any warnings regarding increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines.

Laura Ingraham of Fox News Interviews Dr. Harvey A. Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough about COVID Injection Risks to Those with Natural Immunity and Pregnant Women

Fox News is so far the only corporate news network that is allowing dissenting opinions to be heard regarding the COVID-19 bioweapon shots, even if they are politicizing it. Laura Ingraham interviewed Dr. Harvey A. Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough on her show regarding the risks of government "vaccine coercion" that mass murderer Anthony Fauci and others are encouraging. Both of these doctors and scientists are very well credentialed in their fields, and you can read previous articles published here at Health Impact News featuring these two men by clicking on their names. Both men discussed the growing number of records in the VAERS database with people dying or becoming injured following COVID-19 shots. Dr. Peter McCullough addressed some new studies that show a link between people who have already been infected and recovered from COVID-19 and have natural immunity, and an increase in adverse events in this population group if they get one of the COVID-19 injections. Dr. Harvey A. Risch addresses the absurdity of the CDC Director lying to the American public by stating that the COVID-19 shots are safe for pregnant women, when there have been no studies conducted to show they are safe, and where injuries and deaths are increasing among young children in the VAERS database.

Study: Analysis of VAERS Shows the COVID Shots are Likely Cause of Deaths, Spontaneous Abortions, Cardiovascular, Neurological, and Immunological Adverse Events

America's Frontline Doctors has published a video of a presentation by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, MSc, BSc, who has analyzed the data in the VAERS database related to the COVID shots. The presentation was for "Vaccine Choice Canada." Dr. Jessica Rose has a BSc in Applied Mathematics and completed her MSc in Immunology at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. She completed her PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University and then did her first Post Doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Molecular Biology. She is now doing a second Post Doctorate at the Technion where she will explore the structure and function of transport proteins in bacteria from both experimental and computational points of view. Dr. Rose challenges the "official" position of the political health authorities who keep telling the public that these thousands of reported deaths, and hundreds of thousands of adverse events reported to VAERS, have nothing to do with the COVID shots. Her presentation of the statistics clearly shows that this cannot possibly be true, although she welcomes others to challenge her findings.

CDC Admits 5,800 FULLY VACCINATED People Became Infected with COVID-19 and 74 Died

In a clear example showing how the CDC and Big Pharma control the corporate media, the CDC today apparently sent out emails to the major corporate media outlets allegedly explaining that about 5,800 fully vaccinated people have still come down with COVID-19 after being fully vaccinated, and 74 people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 have allegedly died from COVID-19. In typical fashion of how the CDC operates, they attempted to spin these numbers as something positive, by stating how many people have now been "vaccinated" against COVID, and that one's chance of getting COVID is significantly reduced if you receive the injection. As I saw this statement start appearing everywhere in social media, I tried to find the source for this alleged CDC information, but all I could find were various corporate media outlets stating that the CDC had told them this directly. Apparently this is not on the CDC website anywhere. And as is usual with the Pharma-funded corporate media, there was no investigative reporting done to challenge or even question the data that the CDC was providing. So let me do that. (The CDC did not send me a copy of the letter for some reason.)

Dentists, Optometrists, Podiatrists, Veterinarians Can Now Administer COVID-19 Vaccines in the U.S.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced that the agency is amending an emergency declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) to authorize additional medical professionals to administer experimental COVID-19 vaccines being distributed under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This announcement was made after President Biden stated that he intends to provide directives to all the states and territories to make all adults over the age of 18 eligible for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines by May 1, 2021. Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran said: "As President Biden said last night, the key to getting us back to our lives is increasing vaccinations, and in order to do that, we need more vaccinators. … As vaccine supply ramps up, we want to be sure communities have the help they need to get shots into arms for anyone in the U.S. who wants to be vaccinated against COVID-19." The expanded COVID-19 vaccine administration workforce includes the following health professionals, who are currently or previously active within the last five years (retired or non-practicing health providers): dentists, emergency medical technicians (EMT), midwives, nurses, optometrists, paramedics, pharmacists, pharmacy interns, pharmacy technicians, physicians, physician assistant, podiatrist, respiratory therapists and veterinarians.

Fully Vaccinated People Testing Positive for COVID – So How Does the “Benefit” of Experimental Vaccines “Outweigh the Risk”?

What are being called "breakthrough" cases of COVID-19 are popping up across the U.S. They're people who test positive 14 days or more after receiving their last dose of the vaccine. “It still is shocking that I’m positive. I have no symptoms," home health worker Hanna Rewerts said. The 27-year-old's vaccination card shows she received her second dose of the Pfizer vaccine on January 12. She said she found out she was positive on March 18 from one of the routine tests she takes weekly for work. Believing it might be a false positive, Rewerts said she took a rapid test, which also came back positive. She said her mother and two other family members – all fully vaccinated – also tested positive this week. They are experiencing symptoms. “My biggest question right now is – is it still effective in my system?" Rewerts asked of the vaccine. Rewerts is currently isolating. She said she was told by the health department that she can resume normal activities on March 25, as long as she's not experiencing symptoms. “I think I’d just want people to continue to educate themselves about the vaccine and what’s best for them and their family. I still am happy that I got it, but I really would like there to be more research on the effectiveness," she said. In addition to media reports of breakthrough cases in Florida outside Tampa Bay, the Minnesota Health Department released an advisory earlier this month saying it was investigating instances in that state. It's asking health care providers to report breakthrough cases so that it can look into them further, along with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What exactly are the "benefits" that "outweigh the risk" of being permanently disabled or killed by one of these shots then?

UK Government Changes Recommendations on Pregnant Women Getting Experimental COVID Injections Causing at Least 20 Miscarriages So Far

It saddens us to have to report that as a result of receiving a dose of either the Pfizer / BioNTech MRNA vaccine or the Oxford / Astrazeneca Viral Vector (still MRNA technology), a total of twenty women have now had to suffer the grief of having a miscarriage and losing their unborn child. Adverse reactions to both jabs reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme up to the 21st February shows that the number has almost doubled in just seven days when compared with the previous weeks data, which included adverse reactions to both jabs. When the Pfizer jab was first approved for emergency use only in the United Kingdom, meaning the manufacturer is not liable for any harm or injury caused by their product, the Government’s advice was: "There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose." However the Government has since updated it’s advice within the document, for reasons unknown to the following: "There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus." So now we know why pregnant women have started to be inoculated with the experimental jabs, because the Government quietly changed its own advice based on zero evidence to support it. Even going as far as to remove the recommendation that women of child bearing age being told to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose. Statistically these women stood no chance of suffering from serious illness due to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and the alleged resulting disease Covid-19, now sadly they have to suffer the misery of losing their unborn children. How many more women need to suffer a miscarriage to stop this madness?

Moderna’s Top Scientist on mRNA Technology in COVID Shots: “We are Actually Hacking the Software of Life”

Veteran investigative reporter Leo Hohmann has discovered a 2017 Ted Talk presentation by Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer at Moderna Inc., where he clearly explains in layperson's language just what the mRNA technology does in vaccines. As Dr. Zaks clearly states, they are "hacking the software of life," by injecting their own genetic code into humans. What we are witnessing in this new class of "vaccines" is clearly the wedding together of digital technology born out of the computer age, with Darwinian biology and medicine. In short, the new technocrats of medicine actually believe they can improve the design plan of human beings, replacing God. This is not a conspiracy theory, as they are very arrogant and very open about just what they dream about achieving. This is first and foremost a belief system, with very little to no science involved to back up their claims. We are quickly moving from the realm of science fiction and entertainment, as we see in Hollywood presentations such as Star Trek, where humans can be disassembled and transported (beamed) through space and miraculously put back together instantly, or food can be "replicated" at the push of a button, to real life experiments based on these beliefs by Billionaire psychopaths who have nothing better to do with their wealth other than try to improve upon the human race. Welcome to the brave new world of post-COVID, and the transhumanist agenda. The software engineers of yesterday, who cannot even create a virus-free computer operating system, are now in charge of the "software of life" and working together with the Big Pharma criminal cartel. They also fund and control what is broadcast in the corporate media. What could possibly go wrong?

Johnson and Johnson Has Paid $BILLIONS in Criminal Settlements and Never Produced a Vaccine Before – Why Would We Trust Them for a New Experimental COVID Vaccine?

From its humble beginnings in the 1880s, making cotton gauze dressings and eventually band aids, baby powder and shampoo, J&J has expanded into one of the most powerful multinational pharmaceutical and medical device companies in the world.  But how is it that a drug and household health product company, with no prior history in vaccine development, can develop and rush to market its first vaccine against a viral strain that was only identified 14 months ago?  Developing a vaccine requires many years and necessitates the establishment of an R&D infrastructure vastly different than conventional drug development.  The other major companies developing Covid-19 vaccines have been in the business for decades. But not J&J. There is something more to this story that demands investigation. And if the company’s long rap sheet offers any warning, it is that we must be wary of any claims J&J publicly states about the efficacy and safety of its products. Especially when the pandemic promises to increase the profits of numerous shareholders.

Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers”

When the Pfizer experimental COVID "vaccines" were given emergency use authorization (EUA) in the U.S. in December, 2020, Health Impact News reported that while the U.K.'s EUA for the Pfizer shot had warnings for pregnant women, nursing women, and women planning on becoming pregnant, to NOT get the shot, the U.S. FDA's guidelines for the same Pfizer shot failed to include any such warnings. We also reported previously of at least one case where a pregnant doctor received the experimental COVID shots, and then reported that she had a miscarriage three days later. According to a pro-life group out of New Mexico, a whistleblower who sits on a COVID-19 task force is claiming that many pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, miscarriage, and spontaneous abortions following COVID vaccines are being concealed from the public.

Experimental COVID Vaccine Trials Expanded: Children as Young as 6 to be Injected in Trials in Israel

The University of Oxford plans to test its AstraZeneca-produced COVID-19 vaccine on children for the first time, it was announced on Saturday. The trial seeks to recruit 300 volunteers between the ages of 6 and 17, with up to 240 receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the remainder a control meningitis vaccine. The trial will begin this month at the university and additional sites in London, Southampton and Bristol, Sky News reported. Andrew Pollard, chief researcher on the Oxford vaccine trial, says that while most children don’t get severely ill from COVID-19, “it is important to establish the safety and immune response to the vaccine in children and young people as some children may benefit from vaccination.’’ Other drug companies are also testing the COVID-19 vaccines in children. Pfizer, whose vaccine has already been authorized for use in people 16 and older, began testing its shot in children as young as 12 in October. Moderna in December began testing its vaccine on children as young as 12. Pollard said the Oxford trial should help policymakers decide whether at some point in the future they want to extend mass vaccination programs to children as they seek to ensure schools are safe and combat the spread of the virus in the wider population. “For most children, for themselves, COVID is really not a big problem…,’’ Pollard told The Associated Press. “However, it is certainly possible that wider use to try and curb the progress of the pandemic might be considered in the future, so here we’re just trying to establish the data that would support that if indeed policymakers wanted to go in that direction.”

Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccine Results NOT based on Peer-Reviewed Science – ZERO Liability to Companies if Vaccine Kills or Injures due to FDA Fast-track Approval

VAXXED film producer Polly Tomney and attorney Mary Holland of Children's Health Defense discuss the two most recent COVID vaccine press releases from Pfizer and Moderna which both claimed over "90% effective" and just what this means.  Because these vaccines are expected to apply for FDA fast-track approval due to the COVID "emergency," they do not go through the same peer-reviewed process, and if the vaccines end up injuring or killing anyone, they are immune from any legal liability.