Falling Off the Cliff of Health Freedom into the Pit of Mandatory Vaccination
by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
The CDC published an 88 page set of proposed regulations on August 15, 2016, which would give them the power to apprehend, detain, and quarantine anyone they think might have a communicable disease and to force them to be vaccinated. [1]
These proposed rules would dramatically expand their authority, even though they claim the proposed regulations are mostly about providing updated language to describe their existing powers. These new regulations would give the CDC, and those who must comply with these regulations, the right to invade our privacy whenever they wish. They would have the right to involuntarily apprehend and confine anyone they believe might have a communicable disease. They would have the right to force people to accept vaccinations even when individuals object.
With the new powers granted by the proposed regulations, it won’t be long until “public health” nurses armed with vaccine loaded syringes, and “Homeland Security” officers armed with guns and tasers, go door to door to force vaccinate the United States population for a list of preapproved communicable diseases.
Let’s look at how the CDC is already intruding into the homes of Americans and consider the steps you can take to help protect yourself from receiving forced “medical care” based on what Big Pharma and the United States government wants you to receive. Please take this call for action seriously — total healthcare dictatorship in the United States may only be a couple of months away.
Dictators Always Use Fear to Expand Their Power
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie forced a nurse returning from Africa where she was treating Ebola patients to be quarantined like a prisoner for 21 days back in 2014, even though she had no symptoms and posed no danger to the public according to medical experts. She lived in a tent with no running water. Story here.
The mainstream media propaganda agents began calling the Wynwood neighborhood of Miami “ground zero” for the spread of Zika in the United States. [2] Apparently, they want us to build a connection between Zika and the feelings of shock and terror that Americans felt when we helplessly watched terrorists fly commercial aircraft into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City in 2001.
They want us to experience fear, dread, and horror whenever we hear the word “Zika,” and to emotionally react to Zika as if it was a terrorist threat that only the strength of our government can stop.
One of my previous articles described how fear has been used to develop the Zika public mind control program that has been unfolding since the spring of 2015. This current article will expose even deeper levels of deception and describe how the August events of the Zika mind control campaign are about to place the entire United States under a federal healthcare dictatorship.
Zika: A Masterpiece of Public Mind Control
Door to Door Urine Collection is an Invasion of Privacy
When the governor of Florida called in federal agents from the CDC’s Emergency Response Team [3] to go door to door in the Wynwood neighborhood of Miami to find people with Zika, he set in motion a new standard of government invasion into our health privacy.
Most people would not know how to respond when someone comes to their door and says, “I am from the public health service. We are collecting urine samples to find out if you have Zika.” What would you do when they hand you a urine collection container and tell you that you are to, “Put your sample in here.”
Would you passively follow their instructions or would you object because you consider this to be an invasion of your Constitutional rights and privacy? Would you think of it as an unlawful search of your body and an unlawful seizure of personal and private information about your health status? Or would you just do as requested?
Apparently most people in Wynwood did what they were asked to do. They peed into the cup, and then gave their name, address, and other personal identifying information to the agent at the door.
What did the Government do with the Urine Samples?
When we give a specimen of urine, blood, or any other kind of tissue to the government, we really don’t know what they will do with it. We shouldn’t assume they will do the prescribed test and then immediately destroy the sample.
What happened to the urine samples after they were tested for Zika? Were they discarded? Were they saved for additional testing? If they were saved, then what other tests were performed? Did they do genetic testing? Did they test for the presence of illegal substances?
Lab technicians could gather DNA from a urine sample and produce a complete genetic profile for the person who gave the sample. Based on this genetic information, government agents could develop a health profile for each person.
They might look at your genetic information and make an assessment of the illnesses that you might develop. They might use this information to determine whether your genetic profile will predispose you to become a high cost burden on society when you become older. They might put you on a list of people with genetic abnormalities, which will be used when healthcare rationing begins. They could give your contact information to Big Pharma for participation in experimental medical procedures if you have unusual conditions that would be of interest for drug development. They also might even put your name on a list of people who should be euthanized when the healthcare system financially fails.
In addition, urine samples could be used to determine whether you have been using illegal drugs, or whether you have been using dietary supplements that are unavailable or illegal in the U.S.
It seems to me that the use of a specimen that was given exclusively for Zika screening should never be used for any other purpose. Any form of testing that went beyond Zika identification, would be an unlawful search of a person’s body. This type of search would be a level deeper than a strip search, which includes exploration of hidden body orifices.
The Search for Zika in Wynwood was not about Containing the Disease
The Zika situation in Florida is not an epidemic. It is not a crisis. It is not an out of control situation.
Based on the lack of a true emergency and the lack of any potential endangerment to unborn babies – (Zika does not cause microcephaly) — there was no health related reason for public health workers to go door to door to find cases of Zika.
The door to door urine collection wasn’t really about Zika; it was a trial run to test the power and authority of the government to see how people would react to an invasive call to give specimens. In the future such door to door campaigns may include nurses wielding syringes of vaccines.
If people are willing to freely give their urine, then they may be just as willing to roll up their sleeve and give their arm to Big Pharma and its government representatives for the injection of vaccines.
Many people may avoid vaccinations because they have a vague sense that they are not a good idea, but when confronted by a nurse and an armed officer standing at their door, how will they react? Will they have the strength and confidence to say, “You have no right to come into my home, and you have no right to force me to be vaccinated?” Or will they be intimidated, and passively submit and obey the government regardless of their beliefs?
These are tough questions, which should cause all of us to pause and consider them before public health agents knock on our doors – and as will be explained later in this article — they may be knocking soon unless we object to the newly proposed CDC regulations.
(Editor’s note: door to door vaccinations have already occurred in the U.S. In the video below, the Natomas California school district tried to go door to door one year and find independent study school children – homeschoolers – who had not received the whooping cough vaccine. It is now widely known that the whooping cough outbreaks in California in recent years were primarily among vaccinated children, because the vaccine is ineffective and wears off quickly. Watch how one homeschool mother, at first very courteous, reacted when they told her they were there to vaccinate her child. )
Is History Repeating Itself?
The Wynwood search reminds me of a similar door to door search that took place six decades ago. In experiments conducted by the U.S. military, 300,000 to 600,000 Aedes egypti mosquitoes were dropped over populated areas of Savannah, Georgia and Avon Park, Florida in multiple experiments. Some reports say the mosquitoes were infected with yellow fever and others say the insects were uninfected.
After the mosquitoes were dropped, workers went door to door to ask people whether they had recent mosquito bites or if anyone was sick with fever.
Based on declassified military documents, there is no doubt that mosquitoes were dropped by U.S. military as part of a cold war weapons development program to see whether infected mosquitoes or fleas could be used to weaken or kill enemy troops. [4, 5, 6]
Our government has a long history of conducting hundreds of secret experiments with the U.S. population without our knowledge. They spread bacterial agents over cities and in subway systems. They exposed people to radiation, infectious agents, LSD, and even left patients with untreated syphilis just to see how they would die. [7]
There is no reason to assume that government secret experimentation has suddenly ended. My questions are quite simple. Could the Wynwood Zika situation be a created event? Could they have dropped Zika infected mosquitoes from airplanes? I do not have any evidence that this has happened, but simply wonder about the possibility, and can’t avoid noticing the similarities to the past.
Sometimes I even wonder if there are any Zika infected mosquitoes in Miami, since all the mosquitoes that were captured alive tested negative for Zika virus. [8]
The CDC is Pushing Us into the Age of Mandatory Vaccination
On August 15, 2016, the CDC published a proposed set of regulations, which will update the rules governing how the CDC can apprehend and examine people they think might have a communicable illness, isolate and detain them under federal quarantine, interrogate them, coerce and manipulate them to agree to take vaccines, monitor their activities when they refuse to cooperate, and force them to be treated/vaccinated (given “post-exposure prophylaxis”).
This expanded federal quarantine authority will target points of travel such as airports, train stations, bus terminals, state border crossings, and international borders. It will extend into any part of the United States as they track down anyone who might have been in contact with a sick person the CDC has identified as being a danger to the public health.
Transportation services such as airlines will be required to give the CDC information about each passenger, so that the CDC can locate any passenger and detain them to prevent the spread of a communicable disease. People who have been identified as being a concern can be prevented from traveling between states when they have a qualifying illness.
The CDC will coordinate their efforts with local health departments to work out the details of local intervention. People under quarantine can be monitored with electronic and internet-based means, such as email and webcam application tools. Finally, the CDC can bring criminal charges against those who violate the rules of quarantine, which includes imprisonment and substantial fines.
The CDC describes the scope of their proposed regulation. They state:
SUMMARY: Through this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is amending its domestic (interstate) and foreign quarantine regulations to best protect the public health of the United States. These amendments are being proposed to aid public health responses to outbreaks of communicable diseases such as the largest recorded outbreak of Ebola virus disease (Ebola) in history, the recent outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in South Korea, and repeated outbreaks and responses to measles in the United States, as well as the ongoing threat of other new or re-emerging communicable diseases. The provisions contained herein provide additional clarity to various safeguards to prevent the importation and spread of communicable diseases affecting human health into the United States and interstate.
Both the domestic and foreign portions of this NPRM include new proposed public health definitions; new proposed regulatory language codifying HHS/CDC’s activities concerning implementation of non-invasive public health prevention measures (i.e., traveler health screening) at U.S. ports and other U.S. locations (i.e., railway stations, bus terminals); and proposed provisions for affording persons served with a Federal public health order (e.g., isolation, quarantine) with due process, including requiring that HHS/CDC explain the reasons for issuing the order, administrative processes for appealing the order, and a mandatory reassessment of the order.
In addition, the domestic portion of this NPRM also proposes reporting requirements for commercial passenger flights of death or illness to CDC; a provision allowing for implementation of travel restrictions and issuance of travel permits by CDC for individuals under Federal quarantine, isolation, or conditional release orders, or in response to a state or local request for assistance; and new regulatory language clarifying when an individual who is moving between U.S. states is “reasonably believed to be infected” with a quarantinable communicable disease in a “qualifying stage,” which determines whether such an individual may be apprehended or examined for potential infection with a quarantinable communicable disease. … The NPRM further authorizes expanded forms of public health monitoring, beyond an in-person visit by a public health officer, for individuals who are reasonably believed to be exposed to or infected with a quarantinable communicable disease and subject to a conditional release order. [9]
Identification of Infected People
The first line of communicable disease identification will be the employees who have contact with travelers. The exact list of people who will be involved is not fully described, but is likely to include people such as: TSA agents (Transportation Services Administration) who do airline security clearance, Border Patrol agents who screen people as they enter the U.S., airline agents, passenger train and bus system employees, and any other person who provides ground transportation that crosses state borders.
These kinds of workers will be required to watch for anyone who is coughing, sneezing, or who has a dripping nose. They will be looking for anyone who is sweating or feverish. They will be closely examining exposed skin for signs of rash, blisters, bumps or any other kind of unusual skin condition. They will be monitoring how often people visit the rest room, which could be a sign of diarrhea. They will take note of anyone with an upset stomach or who vomits. They will make notes about anyone who appears to be weak, shaking, or in some way reveals that they might be infected with something communicable.
A seemingly friendly question such as “How are you feeling today?” will be filled with hidden meaning as they probe and scrutinize every passenger for potential communicable illness.
If they identify you as a suspect for communicable illness, then they will be required to forward a report about you to the CDC tracking system. CDC and other government officials will then have the right to apprehend you and detain you in isolation for up to 72 hours while they assess your condition. They will ask you about your vaccination history, examine your electronic medical records, and medical personnel will do a physical examination to gather additional information about your condition.
You will be asked to sign a written agreement to facilitate your release, which could include your commitment to get up to date with all vaccinations by a certain date. If you do not cooperate, then they can place your name on a list of people who are denied the right to travel. Furthermore, they can quarantine you for an indefinite period of time and monitor your activity with a web camera, ankle bracelet or various other electronic technologies until you are no longer a threat or decide to cooperate with vaccination demands.
If you break out of quarantine they have the right to charge you with a class-A misdemeanor. If you are found guilty, you can be fined up to $25,000 and spend a year in jail. If the death of someone can be linked to your unwillingness to be vaccinated and your unwillingness to be quarantined, then the fine can be increased up to $100,000. If an organization of likeminded people (vaccine resisters) helps you and their identity is discovered, then the organization can be fined up to $500,000.
Basically, under this system, you better never look sick while traveling. If you feel a little ill, then you better travel by private car or stay home. If these rules sound like a dragnet for collecting ill people, it is because that is exactly what they are! It will be a system for rounding up and force vaccinating people – especially “vaccine deniers” and “vaccine resisters.”
Diseases on the CDC List of Concern
The proposed regulations identify these diseases at the current time. The regulations state:
These quarantinable communicable diseases currently include cholera, diphtheria, infectious tuberculosis (TB), plague, smallpox, yellow fever, and viral hemorrhagic fevers (such as Marburg, Ebola, Lassa fever, and Crimean-Congo), severe acute respiratory syndromes, and influenza caused by novel or re-emergent influenza viruses that are causing or have the potential to cause a pandemic. … The existing provision also prohibits conveyance operators from “knowingly” accepting for transportation any individual in the communicable stage of any of the specified diseases or in violation of the terms of the travel permit. [10]
Measles is not currently on the list, but measles was given a high profile discussion in the justification for why these new regulations need to be adopted. Measles, Zika, and any other communicable disease can be added to this list by the President at any time by the issuance of an executive order. Influenza would not normally be on the list unless an influenza epidemic/pandemic is declared.
The Regulations further state:
Under this NPRM, any individual under a Federal order, or agreement, of isolation, quarantine, or conditional release for a quarantinable communicable disease, as specified by Executive Order, may be prohibited from traveling in interstate traffic, unless the individual has received a written travel permit issued by HHS/CDC. The term “interstate traffic” is currently defined in HHS/CDC regulations at 42 CFR 70.1 and includes movement from a point of origin in any state or possession to a point of destination in any other state or possession. This provision also applies to an “agreement” for isolation, quarantine, or conditional release. An individual must retain the travel permit in his/her possession and comply with the conditions for travel set forth in the permit. [11]
In other words, uncooperative people will be detained and eventually released with restrictions that prevent them from traveling.
Rights of the States Versus the Rights of the CDC
This is what the regulations have to say about the distribution of power between the States and the CDC. The regulations state:
Lastly, section 361(e) (42 U.S.C. 264(e) states that nothing in this section nor in section 363 (42 U.S.C. 266) (a different section authorizing quarantine in time of war) nor in regulations promulgated under these sections, shall be construed as superseding any provision under state law (including in regulations and provisions established by political subdivisions of states), except to the extent that such provisions conflict with the exercise of Federal authority. [12]
In other words, states can have their own laws for quarantine and forced vaccination as long as state laws don’t conflict with the CDC regulations, which means that state laws cannot be weaker than CDC regulations. Weaker laws would be in conflict.
Example of the Proposed Regulations in Action
Let’s say you decide to fly from New York City to Los Angeles. While in flight there is turbulence and you are observed vomiting in the bag provided for that purpose. Later you are observed visiting the restroom on four occasions, because you have a urinary tract infection. You don’t feel great and are a little feverish. You decided to not eat on the plane, because you don’t want to consume conventionally grown food containing GMO ingredients, glyphosate, and food preservatives, etc.
After 10 hours of traveling, which included a change of planes, you arrive in LA. You are tired and have low blood sugar. You feel a bit weak as you pull down your carry-on bag from the overhead compartment and accidentally drop the bag on the floor. An airline flight assistant helps you pick it up and momentarily touches you. The person notices that you feel hot, look a bit pale, and are shaking a little.
The flight assistant asks to see your ticket and makes note of your name and the seat number where you were sitting. When you walk up the ramp to the gate, you are met by another airline agent who informs you that you are not free to leave the airport, because you need to be screened for the possibility of having a communicable infectious disease. You are escorted to a private room where you are asked to wait.
After 15 minutes or so, a specially trained CDC nurse comes in to speak with you. You are asked to provide your social security number and to show your ID card. The nurse scans your ID card into a laptop, and then uses it to locate the medical records that are associated with your SS number. Next the nurse conducts a basic examination. The nurse looks in your ears, nose, mouth, and throat. Your pulse, blood pressure, and temperature are taken. Visible skin is closely examined and photos taken. Then the interrogation begins. You are asked about your current health status and to explain your symptoms – vomiting, frequent restroom trips, refusal to eat airline food, weakness and fever, etc.
If the nurse believes you, then you might be released from custody. However, you will not be free to go until the CDC nurse tells you that you are free to leave.
The nurse will ask you about your vaccination history. “Are you up to date on all your vaccinations?” If you say no, then deeper interrogation will take place. After the nurse completes the assessment, then you may be asked to sign a CDC Agreement form. This document says that you agree to take vaccines for a specific list of diseases. The nurse also offers to provide the vaccination while you are in detention, so that you don’t have to be inconvenienced by making a doctor visit.
If you sign the agreement, which says that you understand that lying to an agent of the government is a criminal offense punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and roll up your sleeve to be vaccinated, then you will be released and allowed to continue with your travels without further hindrance.
However, if you refuse to sign the document and/or refuse to take the vaccines, then you can be held up to 72 hours while they make further assessments of your condition and arrange for a hearing before a judge. If they believe you are a risk to the health of others, then they can quarantine you and require that you obtain a travel permit if you wish to travel again. They might determine that you cannot fly again until you are vaccinated. They might decide that the only means of travel that you may use to return to New York from LA is to drive in a car. However, you might not be able to rent a car to make the trip when the rental car agencies check your name and find out that you might have a communicable disease made evident by a CDC travel permit, which prevents you from flying.
So, you can either stay in quarantine in a hotel room until the danger of your potential infection has passed, which could take several weeks, or you could drive yourself to New York if you can find a car.
So, let’s say you drive back home, then you shouldn’t assume your ordeal is over. The CDC will pass your apprehension and detention records to your local health department. They will then follow-up and try to get you vaccinated. The original CDC quarantine will still apply and you can be quarantined in your home. This would mean that you would be prevented from working outside your home and prevented from going shopping for food. In addition, they could add your entire family to the quarantine list and investigate the vaccination records of each person in your home.
They may give you an ankle bracelet to wear and place a webcam on your door so that they can track your movement and see everyone who leaves or comes into your home. If your neighbors come to visit and the CDC is able to identify them, then they may also be put under quarantine in their homes.
Of course the CDC says that you have the right to appeal their decisions if you want to hire a lawyer to fight your quarantine. If you are indigent, then they can appoint a CDC agent to represent you during the hearing.
The CDC also will have the right to quarantine you in the isolation unit of a hospital where you will be required to receive treatment. If you have health insurance, then you and your insurance company will have to pay the bill including deductibles. If you don’t have insurance, then they will pay for the portion of the bill directly related to the assessment and treatment of your infectious illness. Any other expenses will be your responsibility.
On the Edge of a Healthcare Catastrophe
The proposed CDC rules will push every person in the United States and every person who comes to visit the United States off the high ground of health freedom into the pit of mandatory vaccination. We will fall into the controlling arms of Big Pharma and the CDC agents who represent them. The public health system will then carry out their vaccination program without hesitation.
We don’t currently have checkpoints between states and we can travel freely by highway. However, such freedom is likely to end in the near future when a public health emergency is declared. Check points will be set up between each U.S. state to capture anyone who might be infected with the disease that the CDC is calling an epidemic.
Take Action to Block the Regulations
The deadline for commenting about these regulations is October 14, 2016. Please use the CDC comment process to provide feedback.
You can read the full set of proposed regulations at this link:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases
You can submit your comments on the proposed regulations by using this link:
Finally, please contact your U.S. senators and your House representative, and tell them of the concerns that you forwarded to the CDC. Our elected representatives need to know that we expect them to watch what the CDC is doing with the regulation review process.
About the Author
John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
See Also:
Is the U.S. Becoming a Police State to Force Mandatory Vaccinations?
References
[1] “Federal Register: Control of Communicable Diseases,” August 15, 2016. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases
[2] “EPA: Insecticide Used To Fight Zika Is Safe,” CBS Miami, Date. http://miami.cbslocal.com/2016/08/04/epa-insecticide-used-to-fight-zika-is-safe/
[3] Gov. Scott: Florida Calls on CDC to Activate Emergency Response Team Following Confirmed Mosquito-Borne Transmissions, 8/1/2016. http://www.flgov.com/2016/08/01/gov-scott-florida-calls-on-cdc-to-activate-emergency-response-team-following-confirmed-mosquito-borne-transmissions/
[4] “BuzzWords,” Archive, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://fmel.ifas.ufl.edu/buzz/wtbioterrorism.shtml
[5] “While Brazil Was Eradicating Zika Mosquitoes, America Made Them Into Weapons,” Sarah Laskow, Atlas Obscura, 6/22/2016. http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/while-brazil-was-eradicating-zika-mosquitoes-america-made-them-into-weapons
[6] “A History of US Secret Human Experimentation,” RENSE.COM, Retrieved 9/1/2016. http://www.rense.com/general36/history.htm
[7] IBID.
[8] “Florida’s Mosquito Control Forces Mobilize Against Zika Threat,” Kaiser Health News, Phil Galewitz, 6/2016. http://khn.org/news/floridas-mosquito-control-forces-mobilize-against-zika-threat/
[9] “Federal Register: Control of Communicable Diseases,” August 15, 2016. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases
[10] IBID.
[11] IBID.
[12] IBID.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
5 Comments