Somebody (a PhD scientist allegedly) emailed this comment in to me (Brian) and I emailed back and asked them to post it as a comment. But since the Health Impact News emails are being blocked by so many Internet providers, they may not have received my email, so I am posting here for them.

Dear Editor,

I am surprised, if not shocked,  when doctors are only using the weak word of “shameful” against those who organize the ban of the HCQ+Zinc+Azithromycin cure for COVID-19.

This is way, way beyond “shameful”.
We have now more than half a million people who died from the disease worldwide when it’s been proven all over the world, without the shadow of a doubt that the HCQ cure is practically 100% effective when taken in the early stage, and has no side-effects.

The case was perfectly summarized by Prof. Didier Raoult, world leading expert in Epidemiology, at his audition by the French Parliament and despite the identified death threats he had to endure:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3860152/posts

With half a million deaths of which a large fraction could have been saved, we should be talking about a possible crime against humanity.

Those who organized this situation are now dictating our destinies.

Doctors have an uncompromisable duty of assistance towards their patients, regardless of the consequences and the retaliations of Big Pharma.

More so, towards humanity in general.
Therefore, they should also disapprove firmly their “colleagues” and “pseudo-doctors” who are afraid to speak out.

They ought to name them for what they are: “Big Pharma sales reps”, and set themselves apart clearly from this untrustworthy category of “doctors”.
This is a global situation of non-assistance of persons in danger at best and of denial of assistance to the entire humanity at worst, by “doctors” who let this happen out of cowardice.

Doctors of countries with malaria should be interviewed and hopefully they will be up to their duties. They will let the public know that HCQ is liberally prescribed at dosages such as 1000 milligrams (1g) per day for any patient that has possible symptoms of malaria, with no further tests.

The prescription of Prof. Raoult  is 200 mg twice the first 2 days, and 200 grams for the next 4 days. It’s ridiculously low compared to the prescription for malaria.
Countries where malaria is active represent almost half the world’s population. Quinine, Chloroquine,  and HydroxyChloroquine have been used alltogether for decades, if not more than a century. There is ZERO evidence that the 200+ million people treated each year for possible malaria have any side effect. If this was the case, the statistics would show it without the least ambiguity.

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/impact.html#:~:text=Nearly%20half%20the%20world%27s%20population,in%20the%20WHO%20African%20Region.
The publication of the Lancet report was an organized fraud, according to the Lancet itself.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext

The deceitful information about the side-effects of HCQ is a propaganda to assist the perpetration of a crime against humanity.

The whole situation should be assessed as a such, and prosecuted as such.

The public must be informed properly. The perpetrators are way beyond shameful and they should be pointed at and indicted.

The appropriate jurisdiction is  the International Criminal Court (ICC) of the Hague, Netherlands.

Doctors of the world, and especially those who regularly prescribe HCQ for malaria, lupus and other diseases should unite into an organization to file a collective complaint to the ICC and be called as witnesses, together with any participant in this crime against humanity.

Doctors should also inform the public about the basics of vaccines, which necessarily require to inject a dose of the antigens that cause the disease. The principle of RNA vaccines is far more dangerous. The antigens are hopefully generated by a genetically modified fraction of the RNA virus, using highly questionable and uncontrollable genetic modification techniques, such as the shamefully unregulated CRISPR, that have the potential to modify the human race or generate pandemics artificially.
https://www.drugtargetreview.com/news/57578/crispr-rna-targeted-genetic-screen-could-be-used-for-covid-19-therapy/
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/crispr-goes-commercial/9359.article

https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/26/could-rogue-scientist-use-crispr-create-pandemic/


With this basic knowledge, which amounts to injecting the disease to hopefully trigger the immunity and not the disease itself, people would probably be more reluctant to turn themselves into guinea pigs of the untested upcoming “vaccine”.

Thereby, people would probably be more interested to know more about the reality of the HCQ cure of Covid-19.