This is a thick, dense and nearly unreadable document for those who don’t speak FDA-ese or are not able to communicate in thickets of insider acronyms. It reads more like a marketing proposal than a scientific report. It is full of statistical bafflegab with pages and pages of charts comparing endless minutiae of differences between the vaccine group and the placebo group. 

As Brian observes, what was in the placebo is very carefully hidden. Also hidden is any mention of other ingredients in the vaccine like adjuvants, potential contaminants and other genetic or nanotechnology material. It is all simply referred to as the vaccine. There is no indication of how the vaccine is made or of how the manufacturing process accomplishes the genetic manipulation wonders it is claimed to do. 

There is also no mention of how the vaccine has to be stored in minus 70 degrees C or why this bizarre requirement is needed. Before it is given it has to be thawed out, diluted with saline and used within 6 hours of being opened.

What on earth is in this stuff?

The document begins with the following statement: 

“Risk/Benefit Assessment

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on public health, and currently there is no broadly effective treatment or prevention available. An effective vaccine can impact the trajectory of the pandemic at this critical time.”

This is simply a lie as any of the thousands of physicians around the world who have had major success treating patients with Hydroxychloroquine/zinc and antibiotic have attested.

Buried in the middle of the document is the report of the deaths of 6 trial participants: 4 in the placebo group and 2 in the vaccine group.

“6.3.3.2.3. Deaths in Study C4591001 Phase 2/3 There were 6 participants, all in Phase 3, who died through the data cutoff date of 14 November 2020. This included 2 participants in the BNT162b2 group and 4 participants in the placebo group. None of these deaths were assessed by the investigator as related to study intervention.”

Aside from being buried deep in the body of the report, it is totally glossed over by the bland assurance that their own investigator concluded the deaths had nothing to do with the study intervention. There follow “explanations” of the deaths which explain nothing. The report obviously hopes all its readers are completely gullible and brain dead.

Overall, the report reads like a total whitewash. Everything about vaccine efficacy is lauded. Everything about adverse anything is minimised/trivialised.

I saw a figure for their long term follow up of any adverse reactions of 50 days. They are asking for this completely experimental substance to be approved on studying it in 38,000 people for 50 days.


Their explanation of how the stuff is supposed to work, targeting the coronavirus spike protein antigen and the encapsulated RNA entering the cytosol of the cell and making a “robust” antibody response to the spike antigen – is all quite fanciful. What else might the invading encapsulated RNA be doing inside the cell in addition to making anti-spike protein antibodies?

All of this mRNA genetic manipulation technology is sorcerer’s apprentice stuff. They really have no idea what they are tampering with. And they expect us to just let them go ahead and inject these scientifically ridiculous cocktails into every one of us, because they assure us it is all effective and safe.

Having read over this report, which will be used by the FDA to make its “decision” to grant Emergency Use Authorisation to this vaccine, it is easier than ever to call BS on the whole enterprise.

I look forward to what other vaccine concerned journalists and experts like Jon Rappoport and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will have to say when they weigh in on this report.

I would also very much like to hear what all the wonderful doctors warning about the CV vaccine that Brian reported on today, would make of this document.  My bet is they would absolutely fry it. And deservedly so.

If the FDA does grant Emergency Use Authorisation to this vaccine on Dec. 10, you can be assured, on the basis of this report, that it was not based on any honest assessment of credible science. Rather it will be because of politics, very corrupt New World Order tyranny politics.

We are under no moral obligation to obey this decision and its sequelae. Rather we have a duty to the future to resist it with everything we are and have.

Terry.