Health Impact News
2017 has started off with a bang. We are only about one week into legislative sessions across the country and so much is happening. New State vaccine legislation is being introduced daily – all over the country. Here’s the status of State bills throughout the US as of 1/17/17.
If you live in one of the following states, there are already vaccine bills filed that can affect your rights if they pass:
AR, IN, KY, MN, MO, MS, MT, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OR, PA, TX, and VA.
This week there are hearings in IN and MO.
PLEASE LOG IN TO http://NVICAdvocacy.org for more information and check back often! Please understand that we are analyzing bills and updating the NVIC Advocacy Portal multiple times a day and this information changes daily. Use this resource to find out what is going on in your state and what you can do to help!
Here is a breakdown of the bills filed that we are tracking as of 1/17/17.
EXEMPTIONS and INFORMED CONSENT
- Restricting Vaccine Exemptions – MN, NY, TX
- Eliminating Vaccine Exemptions – AR, NY, OK, PA
- Required School Exemption Disclosure – VA
- Expand Vaccine Exemptions – NJ, NY
- Add to Who Can Sign Medical Exemptions – TX
- Prohibit Docs from Throwing Exempting Patients out – TX
- Forced Detention and Treatment on Suspicion of Vaccine Preventable Disease – NY
- Expand Vaccine Informed Consent – OR, TX
MANDATES
- Adding New Vaccine Mandates – IN, KY, MO, NJ, NY, OR, VA
- Restricting Vaccine Mandates – NH, NJ
- Prevents Vaccine Mandates for Adults – MS
VACCINE TRACKING AND REPORTING
- Eliminate OPT-IN Consent for Vaccine Tracking – TX
- Expand Vaccine Tracking – NY, TX
VACCINES
- Prohibit Certain Ingredients in Vaccines – MO
- Required Vaccine Promotion/Marketing – NE, TX
- Pharmacists Administer Even More Vaccines – MT, NY
Sincerely,
NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials. We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
