News reporter in India interviews doctors who say more children die from the side effects of the Pentavalent vaccine than those dying from the diseases they are being vaccinated for. Story.

by Christina England
Health Impact News

According to a recent article published in the Hindustan Times, Indian doctors have once again questioned the safety and efficiency of new vaccinations that have recently been added to the national immunization schedule.

The article, which was written by a team of public health professionals led by Dr. Yogesh Jain, stated that:

A public debate on the addition of new vaccines to the national immunisation schedule has been necessitated by recent developments. First, a few years ago, the hepatitis B vaccine was included in the Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP), which initially included six vaccines. Second, the pentavalent vaccine — a combination vaccine against diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, poliomyelitis and hepatitis B — is being introduced in a phased manner in the UIP, with attendant concerns. Third, a slew of new vaccines against rotavirus, rubella, human papilloma virus, pneumococci and the injectable inactivated polio vaccine are under consideration. It is sobering to realise that we still have no vaccine in the works for major infections like dengue and falciparum malaria.

The team made it abundantly clear that, in their professional opinion, all vaccinations should be fully investigated and critically assessed for their suitability, safety, protective efficacy and affordability before they are introduced into any vaccination schedule.

They stated:

Vaccines are given on a mass scale to healthy people, particularly children, with the expectation of preventing illnesses. This raises vital issues around the availability of clear scientific and epidemiological evidence to rationalise the inclusion of new vaccines. It must also be assessed whether there exist other measures such as improved water quality, health care services, access to food and nutrition, etc. that are more effective and economical in preventing diseases for which vaccines are being considered as solutions. Even if it is argued that both vaccines and improving social determinants to prevent these diseases should be promoted, prioritising vaccines over other measures shifts focus from the latter.

They concluded their article with the following important advice:

… All evidence should be placed in the public domain, through technical reports that enumerate their pros and cons. What incidence of side effects is too much for a vaccine to be advised as a preventive health technology? What is an “acceptable” death rate in a vaccination programme? When that occurs, the documentation of adverse events following immunisation, their investigation and determination of the most likely cause must be conducted in a transparent manner. This should be followed by disbursement of compensation to the victims. This would reduce the chasm between those identified as the pro-vaccine lobby and the anti-vaccine one.

Health Impact News believes that they are absolutely correct, and given the number of children who have been adversely affected by vaccinations, many parents would probably also agree.


Dr. Parasuram Ramamoorthi


Dr. Parasuram Ramamoorthi

Dr. Parasuram Ramamoorthi, the chairman of Velvi, an organization working to improve the lives of autistic children in India, agrees.

He told Health Impact News that:

The vaccine-autism controversy is very new to India and only a small population are aware of it. Many go to the vaccination centres without any fear.

We asked him whether or not he agreed that all evidence on the safety and efficacy of vaccinations should be placed in a public domain and whether enough was being done to protect the people of India from adverse reactions. He replied:

It is very important that the public are made aware of the possible dangers of vaccinations and currently there is miniscule work in this direction.

See video, How a theatre tool can unmask autism:

It is possible that one of the reasons why so little is being done to protect the people of India is because India is one of countries named on the World Health Organization’s “hit list.”

India One of Several Countries Highlighted in Document on Population Control

In 1974, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN) published a paper titled National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) – April 1974, in which they openly discussed population control.

In a section titled, Part 2 Policy Recommendations, the groups stated:

B. Key Country priorities in U.S. and Multilateral Population Assistance

One issue in any global population strategy is the degree of emphasis in allocation of program resources among countries. The options available range from heavy concentration on a few vital large countries to a geographically diverse program essentially involving all countries willing to accept such assistance. All agencies believe the following policy provides the proper overall balance.

In order to assist the development of major countries and to maximize progress toward population stability, primary emphasis would be placed on the largest and fastest growing developing countries where the imbalance between growing numbers and development potential most seriously risks instability, unrest, and international tensions. These countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, The Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Colombia. Out of a total 73.3 million worldwide average increase in population from 1970-75 these countries contributed 34.3 million or 47%. This group of priority countries includes some with virtually no government interest in family planning and others with active government family planning programs which require and would welcome enlarged technical and financial assistance. These countries should be given the highest priority within AID’s population program in terms of resource allocations and/or leadership efforts to encourage action by other donors and organizations. (own emphasis added)

It is clear from this paper that India was one of the countries the WHO planned to target.

WHO Executed Their Plan Using Vaccinations

In 1992, the WHO, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the World Bank, met in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the then-current status for the development of “fertility-regulating vaccinations.”

At first glance, it appeared that the WHO was discussing various methods of family planning with women’s health advocates and scientists from developing countries. On further reading, however, something far more worrying emerged.

There were 20 participants at the meeting, ten scientists and clinicians from Australia, Europe, India and the USA who were involved in funding fertility regulatory vaccines (FRVs) research; and ten women’s health advocates from Africa, North and South America, Asia and Europe with backgrounds in immunology, service delivery and social and clinical research, as well as a wide variety of experience working with women.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a new approach to “fertility regulation.”

On page 12 of the report, the groups can be found discussing the development of vaccinations against hCG, a hormone produced by the cells surrounding the early embryo and later by the placenta during pregnancy.

Primates are Rendered Infertile

The WHO stated that hCG is a hormone produced by the body to establish and maintain a pregnancy and further stated that when primates were vaccinated using anti-hCG vaccines, they were rendered infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycle!

What I found even more worrying was the lack of indication as to whether their infertility was permanent or temporary.

According to the WHO, anti-hCG vaccinations were being developed independently by the National Institute of Immunology (NII) in New Delhi, the Population Council in New York and Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP).

The report stated that most of the work was still in the experimental stages; however, vaccines using other hormones had reached the clinical testing stages.

Their plan was executed in full just a few years later. For details, please read: African Women Injected With Vaccines Laced with Anti-fertility Hormones.

India Becomes the Focus of Many Vaccination Disasters

Given these documents, it is hardly surprising that leading experts in India are questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccinations, because over the years, India has been the focus of many vaccination disasters, several of which have been reported by Health Impact News, including:

Supreme Court in India to Rule on Merck Fraud Regarding HPV Vaccine Deaths

Censored in U.S. Media, Killer Vaccines Exposed in India and Around the World

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India

Vaccine-derived Polio Spreading in “Polio-free” India

In August 2016, an article titled Parents sue over vaccine deaths was published in The Namibian, which featured the story of six parents whose children had died soon after they had received routine vaccinations.

It was reported that upon receiving the postmortem results, the parents had decided to approach the Legal Assistance Centre for help to sue the health ministry.

The Namibian stated that:

One of the doctors, Yury Vasin, who did post-mortem examinations on some of the children in Windhoek, told The Namibian that the rate at which babies are dying from six and 12-week vaccination-related deaths is unacceptably high.

The report continued that:

Dr. Vasin claimed that the babies had identical symptoms before they died soon after being vaccinated.

Although Dr. Vasin could not give figures, he said it was a cause for concern for him, and he wrote a letter to the health ministry in 2008 when the trend started picking up.

It appears that something is definitely amiss in India and that doctors and health care professionals are right to be concerned.

As the late Dr. Kalokerinos once said:

Only after realising that routine immunisations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates. The worst vaccine of all is the whooping cough vaccine… it is responsible for a lot of deaths and for a lot of infants suffering irreversible brain damage. In susceptible infants, it knocks their immune systems about, leading to irreparable brain damage, or severe attacks or even deaths from diseases like pneumonia or gastro-enteritis and so on.

Comment on this article at

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?


One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.