CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The World Mercury Project issued a press release this week stating that CDC director Dr. Tom Frieden has blocked CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson from being subpoenaed to testify in a medical malpractice suit in Tennessee.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is one of the attorneys representing a 16 year old boy who is claiming that his autism was caused by vaccine injuries.
The press release states that William Acree, a Tennessee State Circuit Judge, had ordered the trial extended so that Dr. Thompson could be subpoenaed to testify.
Bryan Smith and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., both of Morgan & Morgan, sought to have Dr. Thompson testify to explain his charges that the CDC committed data manipulation in a series of studies that found no link between vaccines and autism. Dr. Thompson has publicly stated to Congressman William Posey and others that he and his colleagues in the CDC Vaccine Safety Branch were ordered to commit scientific fraud, destroy evidence and manipulate data to conceal the link between autism and vaccines.
Dr. William Thompson, a top research scientist with the CDC on vaccine studies, revealed in 2014 that the CDC concealed data from a landmark study used by the CDC to supposedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Dr. Thompson received whistleblower status, and turned over the raw data to Congressman Bill Posey. See:
Will CDC Whistleblower on Vaccines Testify Before Congress?
Congress has never held any hearings on the CDC fraud, however, and Dr. William Thompson has never been subpoenaed to testify.
The stakes in linking vaccines to autism are high, and the current federal Vaccine Court (National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) will not try cases linking vaccines to autism, due to The Omnibus Autism Proceeding where a special court was set up to examine a few test cases claiming vaccines caused autism. This special court ruled that vaccines do not cause autism in the few test cases (out of about 13,000 that had been filed at the time) that they looked at, and then took “autism” off of the list of possible vaccine injuries that families could sue for damages in the Vaccine Court. For more information, see:
How the Government has Earned $3.5 BILLION from the Claim that Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism
So with the revelation of Dr. William Thompson that fraud was committed on at least one major CDC autism-vaccine study, this claim is now being challenged in the Tennessee State Circuit Court.
Due to the high stakes involved, it is not surprising that CDC Director Tom Frieden has moved to block Dr. William Thompson’s testimony.
Vaccine Censorship in the U.S. Mainstream Media
It is unlikely you will read anything about this new malpractice lawsuit in Tennessee in the mainstream media. Former MSM reporter and now independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson has reported on just how difficult it was for the World Mercury Project to get a press release issued through PR newswire. PR newswire reportedly insisted on heavy edits, including claiming the malpractice case attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is litigating in Tennessee “has nothing to do with” the press release, even though it’s the legal case for which the CDC testimony was blocked.
Attkisson produced an image of the edited press release which was allegedly submitted to PRN:
Image source sharylattkisson.com
Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is reportedly appealing the CDC’s denial to allow CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson to testify to federal court.
“This boy, and thousands of others, lost their cases in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program because the CDC and Justice Department submitted fraudulent science wrongly denying the vaccine-autism link.” Smith explained that “Frieden’s denial was a disappointment but not a surprise, since the inescapable implication of Dr. Thompson’s allegation is that the agency altered the science to undermine autism cases worth potentially $1 trillion in compensation ordered by Congress.”
Full Press Release.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
