Health Impact News Editor Comments
Once again, we must look outside of the United States to find research and news regarding vaccine safety. A new study published in Italy, which is of course being censored in the U.S. mainstream media, reveals that vaccines currently used to inject America’s children are contaminated with toxic material not revealed as ingredients in the manufacturer’s product information leaflet.
Proponents of vaccines will undoubtedly be quick to point out that the population is exposed to very small amounts of toxins in our environment on a daily basis, and that this study is nothing to worry about.
However, that is not the case at all. Toxins we encounter naturally in our environment through our digestive or respiratory system have natural immune fighting capabilities to deal with such toxins and eliminate them from the body.
Not so with toxins injected directly into the body, which bypass these natural defense mechanisms.
Make no mistake about it: this study is BIG news and affects the health and lives of everyone receiving vaccines.
New Study Marks Fall of ‘Safe and Effective’ Vaccines
by Jefferey Jaxen
Health Impact News
The ‘safe and effective’ vaccine narrative is crumbling before our eyes.
For years, scientists, health professionals at every level, and parents have chipped away at the false narrative’s shaky foundations. Looking back many will wonder why congress gave vaccine manufacturers blanket protection from any damage their for-profit products caused. Many will wonder why laws were passed to force the unsafe products of a private company on our children. And many will wonder why parents, doctors, and nurses were persecuted for raising valid questions about the damage and injuries they witnessed from the vaccines.
Historians will question how establishment medicine and government marched lockstep to the idea of settled vaccine science when there were never long-term studies of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations, no studies of the US vaccine schedule as a whole, no long-term studies of health outcomes for individual vaccines, and a complete failure — or a willful ignoring — of investigation into vaccine-injury.
Finally, federal oversight committees, judges, and legal scholars may forever question why, after multiple rounds of internal, credible whistleblowers alerted the public of widespread institutional fraud and corruption from within the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), nothing was done except for a complete corporate media blackout.
Despite the damning initial wave of information just laid out, many at every level of society and institution still toe the line of the pharmaceutical party of ‘safe and effective’ vaccines.
The luxury of such magical thinking is now over thanks to the results of a new, Nobel Prize-level study conducted by self-funded researchers at the National Council of Research of Italy and the International Clean Water Institute, USA.
The study, titled New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, represents an unavoidable wave of clear information supporting an immediate moratorium on vaccination, suspension of government laws mandating vaccination, and simultaneous legal action at numerous levels to investigate a criminal vaccine industry and the establishment offshoots that have worked to prop it up.
What did the new Italian study find?
Examining 30 vaccines — representing 44 samples in total — the researchers found particulate matter, in aggregates and clusters, of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter in 43 of the 44 samples whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.
The scientists were “baffled” by their findings of lead, tungsten, gold, chromium, stainless steel, gold-zinc aggregate, platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, silicon and many others. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, an interaction occurs and a bigger-sized compound is created that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body. The authors conclude the following from their findings:
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers.
The analyses carried out showed that, in all samples checked, vaccines contain non-biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the producers.
How did these foreign bodies get into such ‘safe and effective’ products? An exclusive interview of the study’s lead author Dr. Antonietta Gatti revealed more of the story. When Dr. Gatti was asked what he was most surprised to find, he answered:
We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act of faith on which it sounded impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated our analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence.
The consensus from the study’s authors was that the foreign bodies detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. When asked about the burnt waste theory, Dr. Gatti had this to say:
When you burn waste, the particles produced are made of different substances that are rarely seen in combination. In some cases, unusual mixtures of different elements are simply due to chance, depending on the atoms or small molecules that come mutually in touch, and, at least in a number of circumstances we keep coming across, particles with an odd composition is what is present also in vaccines. That does not mean that the origin is the same.
The problems for the vaccine industry keep adding up as reality appears to be giving pharmaceutical giants and their ‘safe and effective’ vaccine narrative no quarter. It was publicly reported in September 2016 that multiple independent lab tests of the MMR II, DTap Adacel, Influenza Fluvirin, HepB Energix-B, and Pneumonoccal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax, 23 vaccines confirmed the presence of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s flagship herbicide Roundup.
How could glyphosate possibly end up in vaccines? According to information reported by Ecowatch, MIT scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff described the mechanism as follows:
Glyphosate could easily be present in vaccines due to the fact that certain vaccine viruses including measles in MMR and flu are grown on gelatin derived from the ligaments of pigs fed heavy doses of glyphosate in their GMO feed. Gelatin comes from collagen which has lots of glycine. Livestock feed is allowed to have up to 400 PPM [parts per million] of glyphosate residues by the EPA, thousands of times higher than has been shown to cause harm in numerous studies.
The present and near future of vaccine policy and its medical reality remain turbulent and uncertain. On a long enough timeline, pharmaceutical business as usual will lead to full, sustained public revolt.
The unofficial appointment of Robert F Kennedy Jr., to a new Trump-created commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity adds hope to over a decade of callous non-action. However, questions remain as to the power and regulatory teeth the newly formed committee will wield against an already deeply entrenched pharmaceutical industry.
Regardless of official government solutions, the results of the new Italian study and other similar ones surely to follow, with the addition of the vaccine glyphosate contamination results, open unlimited channels of legal avenues to oppose mandatory vaccination laws.
In theory, future legal challenges can now rely on new studies to challenge the legitimacy, ethics, and mandates that have rested on the false ‘safe and effective’ vaccine talking points. Foreign matter and chemical herbicides — not listed on vaccine inserts — being directly injected into all levels of society appears to make for a strong case against vaccines and any laws, standing orders, or medical mandates forcing them onto society.
How will history write the final chapters of this generation’s attempt at mandatory vaccination?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.
