Nico LaHood is the criminal District Attorney in San Antonio, Texas.
Health Impact News
The film VAXXED continues to be shown in new cities across the U.S., with the film crew also traveling to these cities to sponsor Q&A sessions after the filming. Producer Del Bigtree states that the story of the CDC whistleblower and cover-up told in the film is “Bigger than Watergate.”
The film crew also films parents of vaccine damaged or vaccine killed children who turn out to view the film and tell their own stories. Each city they go to reveals incredible stories of families who have suffered from vaccines, and wish they had known more about the risks before agreeing with doctors who seldom, if ever, discuss the side effects and risks.
The film crew was recently in San Antonio, Texas where they met Nico LaHood, the criminal District Attorney for San Antonio. You can watch the interview with Nico and his wife below.
The video starts out with Nico in his office, identifying himself and his position as the criminal District Attorney, and then he makes this statement:
I am here to tell you that vaccines can and do cause autism.
Polly Tommey, the co-producer of VAXXED, then interviews Nico with his wife Davida. She starts out by having Nico describe his job as a criminal prosecutor. He states:
So what I do, is I follow evidence. I am an empirical data guy.
He explains how he has to have strong and conclusive evidence in each case, so he can present it to a jury.
Tommey then asks what their beliefs were in regards to doctors and vaccines, before they even had children, and both parents explain how they never doubted what doctors and others said about vaccines, and how they considered them just routine procedures that should be injected into children.
When their first child, their daughter, was vaccinated, she developed a severe skin rash. But the doctors never associated it with the vaccinations. They were never told that this kind of skin reaction is listed as a side effect of some vaccines.
Next, the parents discuss their son Michael, who was a very alert and talkative baby before receiving some vaccines at 18 months. After his 18 month round of vaccines, he developed a twitch. When they could no longer easily make eye contact with their child, they knew there was something seriously wrong. He was diagnosed with autism. He is now 6 years old, and not able to verbally communicate.
Nico then states that he consulted with a friend of his who used to be a scientist for the drug company Merck, which manufacturers many of the childhood vaccines. His wife is a nurse, and they both have decided NOT to vaccinate their children, given the information they know about the dangers of vaccines, and their ingredients.
Nico then began to investigate vaccines, and found out that his family’s experience was also the experience of thousands of other families around the country.
Nico believes that the “circumstantial evidence” that vaccines cause autism in many children is so strong, that he could prosecute the case before a jury and win.
Of course, he cannot do that, because U.S. law gives total legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies for vaccine products, and they cannot be sued for injuries or deaths as a result of their vaccines.
Watch the entire interview:
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
More about the film VAXXED:
Producer of VAXXED Speaks Out: “This is Bigger than Watergate”
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.