Protests over the Gardasil HPV vaccine in the streets of Colombia.
by Jefferey Jaxen
Health Impact News
The scene has become an unwelcome global phenomena — a parent carries their unconscious daughter into the hospital with body language that screams for urgent medical assistance. Countries throughout the world are being forced to share in the mounting injuries caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine. Despite the bad press and rising monetary loses incurred from an endless line of lawsuits, pharmaceutical lobbyist have secured mandates and official recommendations from the majority of global health authorities to push the shot.
Colombia Targets its Girls
Young girls in Colombia being carried into the hospital following the HPV vaccine. Image source.
In June of 2013, the Japanese government withdrew its official recommendation for the HPV shot after thousands of severe adverse reactions. According to a local teacher in Colombia, the girls in the municipality of Carmen de Bolivar received their first dose of Gardasil in July 2013, one month after Japan withdrew the vaccine. The first of three doses in Colombia saw reports of common reactions including redness, swelling, pain at the injection site, etc.
Merck’s HPV shot was deemed “Free and Mandatory” by “Law of the Republic” in Colombia in late 2012. As in many other countries, informed consent was nowhere to be found as parents and their daughters were not made aware of the risks before agreeing to the shot. It was in 2014 during the second round of Gardasil that reports of injuries raced to staggering levels. Reportedly, 800 girls had severe adverse reactions and scores needed emergency medical attention. Parent’s anger was met with silence and denial by Colombian government and health officials. Many families filed their grievances through the proper channels, yet others took to the streets in mass protests burning tires and blocking roads.
As the public tension mounted from the HPV vaccine’s widespread severe adverse reactions, Colombian President Juan Manual Santos was forced to publicly address his people’s concerns stating:
“There has not been found, and there is no evidence that there is a connection between the symptoms of these girls and the vaccine for papilloma virus.”
In his speech, Santos went on to spout the medically incomplete pharmaceutical talking point by saying:
“Scientists have several theories to explain these reports, including mass hysteria.”
Days after the vague speech from Santos, Colombian Minister of Health and Social Protection Alejandro Gaviria Uribe stated publicly in front of scores of reporters:
“I mean, this is a safe vaccine which has been confirmed by all the scientific studies. It is also confirmed by the evidence that is inescapable which is that 170 million doses have been given worldwide and nothing has happened.”
While Santos and Uribe attempted to stonewall their population, lawsuits were already being ruled in favor of granting specialized medical services at no cost to vaccine-injured victims.
The first official judgement was rendered in November of 2014 to a 15 year-old HPV vaccine injured girl from Carmen de Bolivar. The landmark decision ruled that the fundamental rights of the girl and her newborn daughter have to be protected by Colombian health authorities.
Weeks later, another ruling was rendered issuing a provisional decree in favor of ten more girls from Carmen de Bolivar. Both rulings forced the Colombian health system to provide all the required treatments regardless of “whether or not the costs incurred are covered in the patient’s current health insurance program or their Public Health Plan (POS).
One month after the rulings in favor of the injured girls, Colombia’s Director General of the National Institute of Health Fernando de la Hoz released an official study stating the injured Colombian teenage girls all suffered from mass psychosis. The official label of mass psychosis served to effectively block future access to any healthcare (except psychiatric care) for all HPV vaccine injured girls throughout the country.
Before Colombia’s rising vaccine injury numbers, Merck’s Gardasil had already received a mountain of bad press and medical backlash in the short times since its approval. Recently two major medical journals, Vaccine and Neuroimmunology have been caught apparently censoring a peer-reviewed study showing unfavorable results regarding Merck’s Gardasil. Due to conflicts of interest by both journal’s Editor-in-Chiefs, Dr. Gregory Poland and Dr. Michael Racke respectively, the study has been rejected or removed.
Colombian Constitutional Court Steps In
A lawsuit was filed by the family of a girl named Cali currently suffering from a bone disease that appeared to be the result of her 2013 HPV vaccine. All Colombian doctors who examined Cali failed to offer a clear diagnosis of what was happening after her third and final HPV shot that set off serious adverse reactions in 2013.
The family found answers at The Great Plains Laboratory in Lenesa, Kansas. According to The Great Plains Laboratory researchers, Cali’s physical ailments had been caused by the presence of the heavy metals lead, aluminum, cadmium and silver in her body.
This information was introduced as evidence in the recent case brought in front of the Colombian Constitutional Court. Colombian mainstream media has been reporting breaking news this week as the Colombian Constitutional Court has ordered health authorities to deliver “as soon as possible” thorough tests of the initial HPV vaccines given in 2013. The court order directs the District Department of Health Bogotá to conduct toxicology tests to determine whether the HPV vaccines do indeed contain heavy metals such as aluminum, lead, cadmium, silver and titanium.
Following these studies, the National Institute of Health (NIH), the Colombian Association of Rheumatology and the National Cancer Institute are to deliver to the court any studies demonstrating the negative effects and contraindications of HPV vaccines. According to statements, the mission of the court is to establish whether health authorities violated the fundamental right to health of Colombian girls by not previously warning about the alleged negative effects of the vaccine.
Said another way, the court wants to know why, like in every other country where the HPV vaccine is administered, informed consent was not given.
Commenting on the judgement, Colombian Minister of Health Alejandro Gaviria held the pharmaceutical line stating:
“The science has proven time and again that the vaccine is safe and effective.”
HPV Vaccine on Trial in Brazil Also
Also in South America, Brazil is battling the HPV vaccination and its severe adverse reactions. In December 2015, the mainstream news headline titled Federal Public Ministry (MPF) Wants to Ban HPV Vaccination. The Civil Action filed by the MPF asks health officials to suspend the application of the HPV vaccine throughout the country as well as its authorization, importation, production, distribution and marketing of the vaccine. If the court rules in favor of the MPF, Brazil’s National Health Surveillance Agency would be required to collect all batches of the vaccine and return them to the Ministry of Health.
Young women whose lives were destroyed by Gardasil.
Gardasil: The Decision We Will Always Regret
The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life: My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self
Gardasil: An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through
I Want my Daughter’s Life Back the Way it was Before Gardasil
Gardasil Vaccine: Destroyed and Abandoned
15-Year-Old Vaccinated by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain
Recovering from my Gardasil Vaccine Nightmare
Gardasil: We Thought It Was The Right Choice
“HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child”
13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine
If I Could Turn Back Time, Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots
What Doctors Don’t Tell You: Our Gardasil Horror Story
Family Fights U.S. Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
Gardasil: When Will our Nightmare End?
HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony”
Gardasil: Don’t Let Your Child Become “One Less”
The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “Normal”
Gardasil: I Should Have Researched First
“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries
Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed
Gardasil: The Decision I will Always Regret
Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead
Gardasil: A Parent’s Worst Nightmare
After Gardasil: I Simply Want my Healthy Daughter Back
Gardasil: My Family Suffers with Me
Gardasil Changed my Health, my Life, and Family’s Lives Forever
Gardasil: Ashlie’s Near-Death Experience
Gardasil: My Daughter’s Worst Nightmare
My Personal Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine
Gardasil: The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me
A Ruined Life from Gardasil
HPV Vaccines: My Journey Through Gardasil Injuries
The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real
Toddler Wrongly Injected with Gardasil Vaccine Develops Rare Form of Leukaemia
More information about Gardasil
Comment on this article on VaccineImpact.com
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.