October 21, 2014

Study: HPV Rate Lower Among Unvaccinated versus Vaccinated

pin it button Study: HPV Rate Lower Among Unvaccinated versus Vaccinated

Has the CDC done a study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children Study: HPV Rate Lower Among Unvaccinated versus Vaccinated

 

Health Impact News Editor Comments:

Once again, we have an example of a study funded by pro-vaccine researchers that looks at a sub-set of the population and compares those who are vaccinated versus those who are not vaccinated, and finds a result they were not expecting. So they spin the study to make it seem like the result was the one they were trying to prove, and then the mainstream media publishes the spin, instead of what the actual study showed. We saw that earlier this year with a JAMA study looking at vaccinated versus under-vaccinated children.

The latest occurrence of this phenomenon is a CDC study looking at Human Papillomavirus occurrence and vaccine rates. This study was headline news in all the major media outlets last week with headlines such as: “HPV vaccine cut infection by half in teen girls” and “news” stories that looked like they were promo pieces written by the vaccine manufacturer.

Sharlene Bidini has looked at the actual study, however, and points out a few facts that the mainstream media left out (probably because they never bothered to read the study itself.)

Assessing the Overall Impact of the HPV Vaccine

by Sharlene Bidini, RD, CSO
The Oncology Nurse Community

Excerpts:

A new study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, provides new data regarding the effectiveness of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in reducing HPV prevalence.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) started recommending routine Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in June 2006. In order to estimate the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine, researchers used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2003-2006 and 2007-2010.

Here is the conclusion from the study: Within four years of vaccine introduction, the vaccine-type HPV prevalence decreased among females aged 14-19 years despite low vaccine uptake. The estimated vaccine effectiveness was high.

The study conclusion (drawn from the NHANES survey 2007-2010) was based on 740 girls, aged 14-19. However, only 358 were sexually active, and of those, only 111 had at least 1 HPV shot. If the study authors were trying to determine vaccine effectiveness, why did they include the girls who had not received a single HPV shot or did not report having sex?

An interesting fact that was not shared, was that among those 740 girls, the HPV prevalence of high-risk, non-vaccine types declined 20.7 percent (from 20.7 percent to 16.4 percent).

Some healthcare professionals may be quick to assume that the HPV reduction was an obvious outcome after mass immunization. However, the data provided in Table 3 clearly demonstrates that the unvaccinated girls in this group had the best outcome. The study table separates the HPV prevalence into three categories: overall, vaccinated, and unvaccinated.

The overall prevalence of HPV in the study period 2007-2010 was 42.9 percent when the vaccinated and unvaccinated girls are combined. In 2007-2010, the overall prevalence of HPV was 50 percent in the vaccinated girls (14-19 years), but only 38.6 percent in the unvaccinated girls of the same age. Therefore, HPV prevalence dropped 27.3 percent in the unvaccinated girls, but only declined by 5.8 percent in the vaccinated group.

Read the Full Article Here: http://www.theonc.org/author.asp?section_id=2414&doc_id=265168

Vaccine Epidemic
by Louise Kuo Habakus and Mary Holland J.D.

Vaccine Epidemic bookcover Study: HPV Rate Lower Among Unvaccinated versus Vaccinated

 FREE Shipping Available!

More Info

0 commentsback to post

Other articlesgo to homepage

Prescription Drugs Now Factor in Higher Percentage of Fatal Car Crashes Than Alcohol or Marijuana

Prescription Drugs Now Factor in Higher Percentage of Fatal Car Crashes Than Alcohol or Marijuana

Pin It

Prescription drugs and multiple drug combinations are frequently found in the blood of drivers involved in fatal car crashes on US roads, according to a new study in Public Health Reports. Drivers today are more likely to test positive for drugs than drivers 20 years ago, and drugged drivers are now likely to be older than 50. Gone are the days when drunk drivers were our only concern—alcohol is but one of MANY drugs that can make you dangerous behind the wheel. And now many people are on multiple drug cocktails, especially prescription drugs, which multiplies their impairment.

Use of Aborted Human Cell Lines in Vaccines Linked to Rise in Autism

Use of Aborted Human Cell Lines in Vaccines Linked to Rise in Autism

Pin It

Researchers from the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute recently published a study showing a correlation with the introduction of human fetal cell lines used as contaminants in childhood vaccines, and the rapid rise of autism. The study was published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, an open access Academic Journal.

I reviewed the full length research paper and found the methodology of the research very thorough. The researchers tracked not only the introduction of aborted fetal cell lines introduced into vaccines used in the childhood vaccination scheduled in the United States, but they also tracked standards for autism diagnoses as published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. This manual is used in the field of psychology and has undergone several revisions. One of the claims made for the rising rate of autism in America today is that it is primarily related to changes of diagnosis. This study used sophisticated software to account for these changes in autism diagnosis, and found:

“Autistic disorder change points years are coincident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens. This pattern was repeated in the US, UK, Western Australia and Denmark. Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells. Increased paternal age and DSM revisions were not related to rising autistic disorder prevalence.”

Boston Nurses Speak Out Against Mandatory Flu Shots

Boston Nurses Speak Out Against Mandatory Flu Shots

Pin It

Last month (September 2014) the Massachusetts Nurses Association sued Brigham and Women’s Hospital over a new policy that required nurses to receive the annual flu vaccine as a condition for employment.

The nurses were, of course, criticized by the medical establishment. They were accused of putting their own interests above the needs of patients. Lynn Nicholas, president of the Massachusetts Hospital Association, stated that the nurses were: “putting a pet peeve of theirs above the safety and well-being of the patients they serve, their families, visitors to the hospital, and their colleagues.”

Pet peeve? Really?

When nurses all across the United States and Canada are willing to sacrifice their jobs and careers to avoid the annual flu shot, it is time to sit up and take notice. This is obviously something much more than a “pet peeve.”

Trish Powers, representing Brigham nurses in Boston fired back a comment that The Boston Globe published. It is titled “Brigham nurses know flu vaccine can do harm.”

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Pin It

The Gardasil vaccine has changed Skylee’s life in so many ways and we do not know how many more symptoms will show up and change her life even more than it has already done. Our whole family has been affected by this vaccine and all of our lives have been turned upside down that terrible day in 2013.

If only the doctors would recognize Skylee has gone from being a healthy young girl to an invalid when the only major change in her life occurred on the day she had that single shot of Gardasil.

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Pin It

So here is what inquiring minds want to know:

Why did U.S. health officials in Atlanta and on the ground in Africa ignore the exploding Ebola epidemic last spring?

Why did U.S. government officials fly American aid workers infected with Ebola to the U.S. rather than treating them with experimental drugs at hospitals in Africa?

Why did the U.S. government press the United Nations to adopt a resolution calling for no restrictions on international travel from Liberia and other Ebola-stricken countries?

Why did the Centers for Disease Control, supposedly the world’s leading infection control agency, fail to immediately assist Texas health officials when the first case of Ebola was diagnosed on US soil to guarantee that, at a minimum, the kind of infection control measures used in most nursing homes in America would be carried out?

Why has the Director of the CDC repeatedly stated that the only way a person can transmit Ebola is if they have a fever and said that people cannot get Ebola unless they have direct contact with the body fluids of an infected person – but that under no circumstances is Ebola airborne – when he knows, or should know, those statements could be false?

And why are experimental Ebola vaccines being fast tracked into human trials and promoted as the final solution rather than ramping up testing and production of the experimental ZMapp drug that has already saved the lives of several Ebola infected Americans?

A logical conclusion is that some people in industry, government and the World Health Organization did not want the Ebola outbreak to be confined to several nations in Africa because that would fail to create a lucrative global market for mandated use of fast tracked Ebola vaccines by every one of the seven billion human beings living on this planet.

read more


Get the news right in your inbox!