April 17, 2014

Maine Governor Vetoes Raw Milk Bill

raw milk deaths1 Maine Governor Vetoes Raw Milk Bill

Health Impact News Editor Comments:

Governor Paul LePage of Maine became the latest governor this month to veto a raw milk bill that enjoyed widespread support among the people of his state, and had the support of state lawmakers. One would have thought that if a bill like this could be passed anywhere, Maine would be the place, given their strong commitment to family farms and healthy food. But much the same as Nevada governor Brian Sandoval last month, LePage apparently caved into Big Ag special interest groups. David Gumpert provides a good commentary with some inside information below.

Next up: Wisconsin. Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, with 2016 presidential aspirations, will undoubtedly cast aside his cloak of “Tea Party” and “liberty champion” and show that just like his Democratic predecessor, Jim Doyle, that Big Dairy in the state of Wisconsin is not going to allow direct-to-consumer milk sales bypass their milk pools and huge processed dairy industry. No way – not going to happen. Scott Walker needs the support of Big Ag and will undoubtedly trump the will of the people (who recently scored a victory in the jury trial of raw milk farmer Vernon Hershberger) in Wisconsin and state legislators and do the same thing – veto any raw milk bill that reaches his desk. He is already dancing a political dance very similar to the one Maine governor Paul LePage danced as described below, and you can read his latest comments here: Walker expresses mixed feelings on raw milk

Just as a reminder as to the real issues surrounding raw milk, we have posted our graphic above again showing just how “dangerous” raw milk is. The Maine Department of Agriculture has actually unwittingly demonstrated that the “safety issue” is not the main issue in the way they issue raw milk licenses for on-farm sales (story here.)

Oh, there is danger alright with raw milk sales. But the main danger is that farmers will earn a higher profit on their product, while consumers get a healthier product, and that is dangerous to the Big Dairy industry who stand to lose. Guess who will win this battle?

Behind the Scenes of Maine Guv’s Raw Milk Veto Dance

by: David Gumpert
The Complete Patient

Any politician worth his or her salt is good at charades–you know, the game where you pretend you are something that you’re not.

Maine’s governor, Paul LePage, has given a masterful performance as a supporter of small farms since he was elected as a Republican in 2009. In September 2011, after receiving complaints from farmers about a crackdown by the state’s Department of Agriculture to end a decades-long tradition whereby Maine’s small farms were able to sell raw milk directly to friends and neighbors, without needing a dairy license, LePage wrote a memo questioning the crackdown. He expressed his support for legislation to restore the traditional practice.  (Dairies that want to advertise their raw milk, or sell via retail, need to obtain a license to sell raw milk.)

During the legislative session just ending now, the Maine legislature passed a version of the legislation he said he supported in his 2011 memo, to allow raw milk sales of up to twenty gallons daily for unlicensed dairies. And suddenly, the governor seemed to vacillate, and as Deborah Evans notes in a comment following my previous post, he vetoed the legislation.

Maine, of course, has been a hotbed of activity for food sovereignty, and ten towns have passed ordinances permitting direct food sales by local farmers to individuals, outside state and federal regulation. A state court recently struck down one of the ordinances.

One of the original organizers of the food sovereignty initiative, along with Deborah Evans, has been Heather Retberg, a dairy farmer, and in her ongoing efforts to push state legislation to help small farms, she has gotten to know the governor. Yesterday, when he seemed to be vacillating on the raw milk legislation, she wrote him a letter expressing concerns, recalling an exchange her husband had with him when he was seeking votes.

“My husband asked you a question while you were campaigning…He asked what you might do to offer protection to farmers from the pressure of federal agencies. You interrupted him to say that you would personally show ‘the Feds’ to the border of the state of Maine. I was given to think after our meeting with you (last) January that your administration would offer strong support to small farms this session.”

Shortly after emailing the letter, she told me, “I got a very surprising phone call…from the governor! He told me he likes the bill and wants to make it work, but is still trying to work out a detail with the Department of Agriculture on the farmers market inclusion [allowing direct sales at farmers markets]. They are worried about the chain of custody of the milk at the markets, that another farm could be doing one farm a favor and selling milk or an apprentice or employee and not the farmer….I mentioned the track record in New Hampshire on this bill. He’d been given to understand that there IS a licensing requirement in New Hampshire on their raw milk exemption and that Maine’s law ‘goes further.’ He had plans to talk to folks in New Hampshire this afternoon or tomorrow so he can get this resolved…”

Since I spend a lot of time in New Hampshire, and sometimes buy raw milk at farmers markets, I knew that the governor’s information was wrong. Small dairies are allowed to sell up to twenty gallons of raw milk a day, without need of a license, either direct from the farm or at a farmers market.  I looked up the rules, and forwarded them to Retberg, who immediately sent them on to the governor. (The last paragraph of page 1 explains the exemption for small dairies, direct from the farm or at farmers markets.)

According to Retberg, the proposed Maine legislation actually went further than New Hampshire’s rules, since “our legislature added a testing requirement for milk ten times a year and water twice a year. After our conversation (with the governor) I was convinced the governor was looking for a way to sign this bill, but still had to work out the Department of Agriculture’s objections. He repeated his support for small farms, that he liked this bill, and he’d work on it and talk to folks in New Hampshire to find out more.”

Late last night, the governor vetoed the legislation, saying in part, “I support the vast majority of changes to Maine law contained in this bill.” He was hung up, though, on the farmers market sales. He would support a revised version of the legislation to address the farmers market sales. “If farmers market sales are to remain, a mechanism to verify chain of custody must be included.” Huh?

The matter of “chain of custody” had never before come up before from the governor or anyone before yesterday, says Retberg. It was clearly an idea planted in his mind by his Department of Agriculture.

What finally convinced Gov. LePage to veer away from signing the legislation? We’ll never know for sure, but his views definitely changed after he spoke with Retberg, and after he learned that New Hampshire has long done what Maine was proposing to do, with no ill effects or reports of problems.

He was probably convinced by the same things that convinced the governors of Wisconsin, California, and Nevada to veto raw milk legislation after overwhelming votes in favor by the legislatures–threats that it would cost them money, via federal grants to their states and/or contributions to their campaigns. Gov. LePage has just announced he is running for re-election. He must have made a calculated decision that any votes he’d lose from the raw milk/food sovereignty supporters could be made up for with the campaign contributions he’d keep by vetoing the legislation.

The food rights movement is definitely learning its way through the ways of the political world. Maybe the lesson of these vetoes is that, when it comes to serious politics and decisions that affect corporate revenues, you have to pay to play.

Read the Full Blog Post here: http://thecompletepatient.com/article/2013/july/10/behind-scenes-maine-guvs-raw-milk-veto-dance

The Raw Milk Revolution
Behind America’s Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
by David E. Gumpert

Raw Milk Revolution book cover Maine Governor Vetoes Raw Milk Bill

FREE Shipping Available!

More Info

 

0 commentsback to post

Other articlesgo to homepage

Diet Soda Sales Plummet as Consumers’ Understanding of Deadly Health Risks Grow

Diet Soda Sales Plummet as Consumers’ Understanding of Deadly Health Risks Grow

Soda consumption is now in “freefall,” having dropped to its lowest point since 1995, with diet sodas taking the greatest hit.

One of the largest studies of its kind found that drinking just two diet drinks a day can increase your risk of an early death from heart disease by 50 percent. Previous research looking at aspartame toxicity also found a clear association between aspartame consumption and non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and leukemia.

Obesity Now Threatens to Overtake Hunger as Global Health Concern Number One

Obesity Now Threatens to Overtake Hunger as Global Health Concern Number One

In 1950, the number of starving individuals on Earth was estimated to be around 700 million; 100 million people, primarily in rich countries, were obese. By 2010, the world’s hungry had marginally grown to 800 million, while the number of obese citizens of the world had exploded to 500 million. Estimates suggest that by 2030, more than one billion people, worldwide, will fall into the obese category.

Illinois Legislators Back Off Raw Milk Ban After Consumer Outrage

Illinois Legislators Back Off Raw Milk Ban After Consumer Outrage

Under current Illinois law, farmers can sell an unlimited amount of raw milk on the farm without a permit. Legislators and health officials were working hard to completely banish farm-to-consumer agreements in some sneaky ways. This was not lost on Illinois’ thriving raw milk market.

Now, a proposed bill in Illinois banning the sale and distribution of natural or “raw” milk, has come to a screeching halt this session after legislators heard from thousands of natural milk supporters.

The Health Benefits of Maple Syrup: Why You Should Replace Processed Sugar with Maple Syrup

The Health Benefits of Maple Syrup: Why You Should Replace Processed Sugar with Maple Syrup

Maple syrup is one of the many wonders of the world and far more than a simple sweetener. Maple syrup is not only rich in essential nutrients such as manganese as well as zinc, but 34 new beneficial compounds discovered just a few years ago have been confirmed to play a key role in human health.

Antioxidants found in maple syrup have anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, and anti-diabetic properties.

Soy-Based Formula Linked To Seizures In Children

Soy-Based Formula Linked To Seizures In Children

Phytoestrogens in soy-based formulas are known to carry greater risks than benefits for infants. Babies fed soy-based formula had 13,000 to 22,000 times more isoflavones in their blood than babies fed milk-based formula. New data published in PLoS One shows that consumption of soy formula may also be associated with a higher rate of seizures in children. In addition, while true cancer of the prostate, carcinoma, is seldom seen in infants and children, other forms of malignant tumors may develop and more cases are appearing in developed nations where the link appears to center around soy infant formula.

read more


Get the news right in your inbox!