April 19, 2014

New Alzheimer’s Imaging Test Provides NO Benefits, Only Profits for Drug Companies

worthless ct scan New Alzheimers Imaging Test Provides NO Benefits, Only Profits for Drug Companies

by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection

 On Friday, April 6, the FDA approved another of Eli Lilly’s “breakthroughs” whose clinical value is questionable (at best).  The focus, in this instance, is not a therapeutic intervention, but rather a test using a radioactive imaging agent– a dye, brand name, Amyvid (florbetapir)–which is to be used in brain PET scans to identify amyloid clumps. The presence of amyloid in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients has been observed post mortem in autopsies. However, amyloid plaques have also been found in the brains of at least 20% of healthy elder adults with no cognitive problems.  Thus, the finding of amyloids doesn’t mean the person has Alzheimer’s.

Furthermore, FDA acknowledges that most doctors are not trained to interpret brain scan results–raising further doubts about the justification for its marketing approval of Amyvid.  The test will likely result in a high percentage of false-positives greatly expanding the number of people mistakenly identified as having Alzheimer’s.   Such a flawed test is of no clinical value–it will increase anxiety, add confusion for seniors and their families, and it will increase healthcare costs without any benefit for patients with Alzheimer’s.

As a thoughtful comment on Forbes website points out, “(sadly) amyloid imaging does nothing to contribute in any substantive way to a change in standard or attempted management of dementia.”

The dye was developed at the University of Pennsylvania which reaped a hefty profit when Eli Lilly bought it for $800 million. News of FDA’s approval–a move, which Forbes reported, “took most people who watch pharmaceutical companies by surprise”– was accompanied by flim flam hypein an effort to overcome its negative aspects by claiming those aspects to be positives.:  “We’re excited. The approval means that this product will finally be available to the patients who need, and can benefit from, this,” said Avid Radiopharmaceuticals’ founder and chief executive officer, Daniel Skovronsky, 39, a Penn neuropathologist.

In point of fact, Lilly nadmits in the drug’s label that:  “A positive Amyvid scan does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder.”
To overcome the lack of professional competence to read PET scans, the FDA worked with Eli Lilly to develop a three-hour online crash training program for doctors!!
However, the professional incompetence problem is hardly resolved.

Forbes reports that Lilly’s Amyvid prescribing label discloses that in a 59-patient study in which ALL Amyvid readers of a patient’s Alzheimer’s status–that was later determined by autopsy–got at least 5% and up to 14% of diagnoses wrong. This inconsistency indicates that the test is inaccurate, not objective, is dependent on subjective interpretation.

Though it lacks a clinical justification for its use, Amyvid has a commercial use for drug developers.
Shirley Wang of The Wall Street Journal notes that those who favor using Amyvid and similar agents currently under development have said that such technology will accelerate research by helping to identify people at high risk of developing Alzheimer’s and to enroll such people in clinical drug trials. Matthew Herper of Forbes states: “Where tests like Amyvid will obviously be very useful is in testing new drugs. If drug companies can screen out patients who are likely not to have Alzheimer’s, they are far more likely to be able to show that medicines aimed at Alzheimer’s are effective in clinical trials…. This really is a clever move by Lilly to make some profit on a research tool. ”

What an ingenious utilitarian use for a flawed, inaccurate screening test! Eli Lilly will be marketing a test–with FDA’s seal of approval–that will stigmatize and traumatize hundreds of thousands of elder people who will then be corralled to serve as free human drug testing subjects!

Eli Lilly has been enormously successful in marketing clinically useless drugs with debilitating side-effects that became blockbuster sellers, thanks to aggressive, unethical marketing tactics –Oraflex, Evista, Prozac, Zyprexa, Xigris, to name a few.

In 2001, having gained FDA approval of  Xigris for the treatment of sepsis, which it sold for $6,800, then raised to $8,000 per 4-day course of treatment,
Eli Lilly’s chairman, president and CEO, Sidney Taurel, told shareholders: “No medicine better symbolizes our mission than Xigris,” calling it “one of our industry’s genuine breakthroughs.”

But Xigris was found to be worthless for the treatment of sepsis shock–it failed to show a survival benefit.  To promote the use of Xigris, Lilly embarked on a deceptive marketing campaign to overcome negative evidence–i.e. increased bleeding and deaths in clinical trials.  Lilly’s aggressive marketing blitz included manipulating–with cash payments–a task force of 20 scientists and hospital directors charged with formulating sepsis clinical guidelines. The guidelines recommended Xigris despite negative evidence from clinical trials.  The company ultimately withdrew Xigris in 2011 after cashing in about $1 Billion.

If the FDA’s goal in its licensing determinations is to bankrupt the nation’s healthcare budget by approving worthless, all-too-often hazardous drugs, vaccines, and drug devices that undermine rather than improve health, it is doing a commendable job!

Read the Full Article Here: http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/842/9/

See Also:

Coconut Oil and Alzheimer’s Disease: The News is Spreading

0 commentsback to post

Other articlesgo to homepage

U.S Congressman: CDC Can’t be Trusted Regarding Vaccine Safety

U.S Congressman: CDC Can’t be Trusted Regarding Vaccine Safety

Congressman Bill Posey’s strong resolve and demands for transparency were evident as he discussed the Center for Disease Control (CDC)’s handling of vaccine safety studies which affect “our most precious resource in our nation – our children.” The 30-minute interview, conducted by vaccine industry watchdog, PhD biochemist Brian Hooker, delves into what Posey called “the incestuous relationship between the public health community and the vaccine makers and public officials.”

The Florida legislator, known as “Mr. Accountabililty,” did not mince words when criticizing current and past CDC officials including indicted fraudster Dr. Poul Thorsen; CDC director turned Merck Vaccine President Dr. Julie Gerberding; and the agency’s current spokesperson regarding autism and vaccines, Dr. Coleen Boyle.

Congressman Posey said, “The CDC can’t be trusted regarding investigating vaccine safety. Huge conflict of interest. I think the CDC should be investigated.”

Merck’s Former Doctor Predicts that Gardasil will Become the Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time

Merck’s Former Doctor Predicts that Gardasil will Become the Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time

In an interview with Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer Merck, he predicts that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time. Dr. Dalbergue believes that at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill young girls, serves no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.

Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How big pharma has corrupted healthcare

Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How big pharma has corrupted healthcare

An important new book by a recognized medical research expert describes Big Pharma as akin to the Mafia. In an interview conducted by our colleagues at ANH-Europe, Dr. Peter C. Gøtzsche exposes the flaws of the drug approval system, our reliance on dangerous drugs, and the deadly co-dependence between regulators and industry. Dr. Gøtzsche is co-founder of the highly respected Cochrane Collaboration and Cochrane Reviews, a leading journal of evidence-based medicine. The interview is particularly timely now that the FDA has decided to remove restrictions on the dangerous drug Avandia.

Dr. Gøtzsche’s new book, Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare, points out that the pharmaceutical industry is allowed to test their own drugs, and thus effectively be their own judge. He calls this a threat to safe medicine and asks for open access to all research data, including raw data, because otherwise, data can be easily suppressed and conclusions manipulated by industry.

Medical Cannabis is a Threat to the Pharmaceutical Industry

Medical Cannabis is a Threat to the Pharmaceutical Industry

Medical marijuana, or cannabis, is legal in 20 US states, where it is used for a variety of medical conditions such as mood disorders, pain disorders, multiple sclerosis, and even cancer. Parents of children with epilepsy met at a news conference to share their dismay that Governor Mark Dayton refuses to legalize medical marijuana. About 85 percent to 95 percent of Americans are in favor of medical cannabis, and nearly 60 percent are in favor of legalizing marijuana. Cannabis shows outstanding promise as a medicinal plant, largely due to its cannabidiol (CBD) content. Cannabinoids interact with your body by way of naturally occurring cannabinoid receptors embedded in cell membranes throughout your body.

Leaders of Teaching Hospitals Have Close Ties to Drug Companies, Study Shows

Leaders of Teaching Hospitals Have Close Ties to Drug Companies, Study Shows

Pharmaceutical company payments to doctors extend far beyond rank-and-file clinicians — and deep into the leadership of America’s teaching hospitals, according to a study published recently in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

A team of researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center examined the boards of the 50 largest drug companies by global sales (excluding three companies that were not publicly traded). The researchers found that 40 percent — 19 companies — had at least one board member who also held a leadership role at an academic medical center. Sixteen of the 17 companies based in the United States had at least one. Several had more than one. All told, the research team found that 41 of the companies’ 2012 board members held leadership positions at academic medical centers. Six of the 41 were pharmaceutical company executives who served on hospital boards of directors or held other leadership posts.

The authors wrote that when academic medical leaders serve on pharmaceutical company boards, it can lead to conflicts not only for individuals, but for the critically important health care institutions they guide.

read more


Get the news right in your inbox!