by Paul Fassa
Health Impact News
Hayley Willard was one of the first to receive a Gardasil vaccination at 15 years of age in Newfoundland, Canada in 2010. Up until then, she was a very active extroverted person who was actively involved in figure skating competitions.
Her mother Dana explained that Hayley was a healthy, enthusiastic daughter until Gardasil came into her life, although she had minor short-lived adverse reaction from vaccinations before.
But after her Gardasil shot she was showing signs of autoimmune issues. Her energy level decreased, she was easily fatigued and looking pale. Then she became sluggishly lethargic with low energy, began gaining weight, was having migraines, and other symptoms. She complained that she was not feeling right and beside herself.
Her skating became erratic and she injured herself while practicing. Cysts were discovered in her ovaries, an area that was never an issue with Hayley before. She began having anxiety attacks that were unusual for her and inexplicable.
None of the doctors would even imply that the Gardasil vaccine had anything to with her condition. They wanted to prescribe antidepressants instead.
But Dana was intuitively suspicious and began researching on the side effects of Gardasil and other vaccines. She soon began realizing it wasn’t a coincidence that her health issues began immediately after Hayley’s HPV vaccination. Her immune system had been compromised severely.
Many reported adverse events that Dana discovered from the HPV vaccine included what Hayley was experiencing, often even worse.
But the worst event occurred in 2013 when Hayley was diagnosed with leukemia.
Leukemia and other cancers have been reported as a consequence of Gardasil vaccines and other vaccinations. Dana discovered the news of a New Zealand toddler who was vaccinated by mistake with Gardasil. This led to his leukemia.
Dana Felt There was No Option Outside of Chemo
In October of 2013, Hayley was subjected to intense chemotherapy. The first 10 days of which she was confined in the hospital with ongoing IV chemotherapy. Then her IV chemo sessions at the hospital were on an outpatient basis.
During that time, Dana said Hayley experienced every side effect possible. Intense vomiting, complete hair loss, sores in her mouth and throat, and increased weakness. Her saliva glands overproduced and she had to be fitted with a device similar to what dentists use to remove the excess saliva from her mouth.
Dana explained the “catalyst for questioning chemotherapy” occurred when in the processing of arranging the chemo bag in position to IV into Hayley’s chest port some of the “therapeutic” chemical spilled on her chest.
The nurse pressed a button for other hospital attendants to rush in and assist with ripping off Hayley’s t-shirt, other clothing, and the bed sheets. Dana was rushed out of the room and into the hallway as others rushed in to handle the emergency, which was explained to Dana after the drama was over.
The explanation was that IV chemo drugs are harmful to the skin if spilled and can cause cancer. The light went on in Dana’s mind that this whole conventional procedure is madness and at some point needed to be curtailed.
In addition to her IV and oral chemo pills, Hayley was prescribed several pharmaceutical drugs attempting to curb the chemo side effects. Hayley told her mom that she was aware of smoking marijuana to help with chemo’s side effects. Hayley had smoked it before occasionally.
Cannabis to the Rescue
After six weeks of intense chemotherapy, the doctors announced that Hayley’s leukemia was in remission. But they wanted to continue chemotherapy less intensely for three years to keep it from coming back! Dana decided this was a bit crazy. She felt strongly that Hayley’s will to live made her survive chemo, and it just “wasn’t her time” to pass on. But somehow there shouldn’t be chemo anymore.
So Dana did her due-diligence research again. This time with cannabis. She had held the propagandized Reefer Madness mindset until she started her own unbiased research. She discovered that cannabis oil is the solution not only for chemo side effects, but probably for cancer itself.
Dana had learned online through someone’s website how he cured himself of leukemia completely and without side effects using cannabis oil. Instead of ordering it online, she decided to make cannabis oil herself, using a magical butter machine shared by a friend of hers.
How to Make Cannabis Coconut Oil with the Magical Butter Machine:
Dana learned quickly. She infused the cannabis into coconut oil and gave Hayley 10 milliliters per day orally from a syringe without informing anyone in the hospital for a few weeks.
Hayley’s positive results were amazingly rapid. In one week, her blood sample results stabilized after weeks of ups and downs and were positive. At first, the doctors and hospital staff had no idea what was going on. They just thought they were getting results. At home, Hayley was feeling much better. She wasn’t vomiting and her appetite had returned.
So after a few weeks, mother and daughter had the realization that cannabis was all that was needed. Hayley and Dana announced that they were surreptitiously using cannabis oil and explained that’s where the improvement came from. Hayley, no longer a minor, had the right to refuse treatments without concern of legal intervention, aka medical kidnapping. 
Surprisingly, the hospital staff only half-hardheartedly tried to dissuade Dana from quitting the three-year chemotherapy protocol after six weeks in. After four years of cannabis oil use only, Hayley is still healthy and cancer free, though sometimes Dana needs to remind Hayley to take her oil when she lapses from taking it and she looks exhausted.
Hayley has become slightly careless because she doesn’t feel sick anymore, and she isn’t.
This Vaxxed TV video interview of Dr. Suzanne Humphries will give you more detailed insight into the Gardasil no-benefit-all-risk situation. Just say no!
Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Gardasil:
Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped 
HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony” 
“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries 
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here! 
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Order here! 
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.