Since this story was published representatives from SaneVax, Inc. , one of the Internet’s leading portals on the dangers of the Gardasil vaccine, notified us that there have been entries into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database  citing instances where breast-fed healthy infants have died after their mothers were vaccinated with the Gardasil vaccine. One such case is VAERS ID: 398755
Information has been received from a physician for the pregnancy registry for GARDASIL, concerning a female who on 01-SEP-2010 was vaccinated with the first dose of GARDASIL (lot number not reported) intramuscularly while breastfed her baby was 40 day old (WAES 1009USA00625), it was reported that the mother”s and baby”s health were good (well controlled). On 02-SEP-2010, in the morning, the baby”s condition was still good but in the afternoon the condition suddenly drop. The family immediately took the baby to hospital and it did not help since the baby died shortly after that. The cause of death was not reported, it was also reported as “not recovered from death”.
Could it be that nursing mothers who are vaccinated with Gardasil are passing on the contents of the vaccine to their infants through their breast milk?
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) in collaboration with Merck pharmaceutical company is planning to conduct Gardasil 9 vaccine trials  on postpartum mothers between the ages of 16 to 26 immediately after giving birth at the UAB hospital.
According to ClinicalTrials.gov , the desired outcome of this study is to have more young women vaccinated with the Gardasil vaccine, because they do not believe enough young women are being vaccinated:
Due to low HPV vaccine uptake in the US, innovative approaches to vaccinating vulnerable populations are necessary in order to maximize the cancer prevention potential of this vaccine.
Previous studies on the Gardasil vaccine have shown that young women who are in the hospital due to giving birth are open to receiving the Gardasil vaccine, particularly Hispanic populations:
The puerperium is a time period when women are engaged in the healthcare system and have almost universal access to affordable health care.
Two prior studies have shown that postpartum HPV vaccination is acceptable to patients, and high rates of vaccination were achieved in these primarily Hispanic populations.
Merck and UAB want to test the vaccine on 16 to 26 year old postpartum mothers because “the immune response in young women is less robust than in adolescents,” and because “no studies have examined immunogenicity in postpartum women specifically.”
Therefore, 16 to 26 year old young mothers who have just given birth at the UAB hospital will become test subjects of the Gardasil 9 vaccine.
The study is scheduled to start on June 1, 2018.
The “Responsible Party” who apparently designed the study at UAB is Professor Warner Huh.
The contact person for the clinical vaccine trials is Sarah Dilley, MD 205-934-2749 email@example.com. (Source .)
Should Young Mothers Who Have Just Given Birth Participate in these Vaccine Trials?
The Gardasil HPV vaccine is probably the most controversial vaccine in the world right now, with many countries withdrawing their approval of the dangerous vaccine.
Outside of the U.S. parents and organizations have taken legal action against Merck for injuries and deaths due to Gardasil, and in France one doctor who previously worked for Merck predicted that Gardasil would become “the greatest medical scandal of all time .”
As we just reported recently , the documentary film trilogy, Sacrificial Virgins, which recounts the stories of many young women injured by the HPV vaccine, received the prestigious Best of the Festival award, and the Watchdog Spirit Award in recognition of the investigation “in search of truth and justice” at the Watchdog Film Festival, held in Brisbane, Australia. (Story here .)
Thanks to U.S. laws that protect pharmaceutical companies from being sued due to damages and deaths resulting from vaccines, much of the controversy surrounding Gardasil has been censored in the corporate “mainstream” media.
In the alternative media, however, millions of Americans are reading about the controversial vaccine, and it has been the #1 topic on Health Impact News for the past 3 years.
Will these young mothers in Alabama have sufficient information to make the decision to participate in these Gardasil vaccine trials just after giving birth? Will they understand the potential risks for harm, which includes heart disease (POTS ), premature menopause (“Primary Ovarian Failure ”) and a whole list of autoimmune disorders  that have been hidden from the public but revealed by a 2017 study done in Mexico ?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com. 
Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped 
HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony” 
“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries 
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here! 
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Order here! 
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.