Health Impact News Editor Comments
The official report from the CDC and pharmaceutical companies is that HPV vaccines prevent cervical cancer. Various studies have been produced in the past couple of years to give credence to this belief, allegedly showing that HPV cancer rates are decreasing since the vaccine was introduced.
However, a new study  just published shows that the data used by the government to determine HPV cancer deaths was inaccurate because of faulty data. It included women who had hysterectomies, and therefore had ZERO risk of developing cervical cancer.
One of the facts uncovered by this study was that the actual death rate for black women was nearly double than what was reported:
For black women, the corrected mortality rate was 10.1 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-10.6), whereas the uncorrected rate was 5.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 5.5-6.0).
The HPV vaccine only vaccinates for a very small number of known HPV strains, and as we have reported previously here at Health Impact News, these strains are the WRONG strains for African American women. See:
Given the fact that thousands of young women have been harmed by the HPV vaccine, and some have even died, one must ask why any African American woman would ever want to receive an HPV vaccine?
An even more important question to ask is why are government health officials and doctors continuing to recommend this vaccine to black women, and what can be done to stop this criminal practice, given the fact that U.S. law protects the manufacturer from being sued in court over injuries and deaths due to vaccines?
HPV Study Finds Higher Risk of Cervical Cancer Deaths in Older Black Women
The journal Cancer last month published a study that looked at mortality data gathered by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) between 2000 and 2012, and then applied new parameters to re-calculate the reported death statistics from cervical cancer in the United States. 
The study’s authors acknowledged that previously reported mortality numbers had included women with no risk of developing cervical cancer because they had undergone a complete hysterectomy that included removal of the cervix. Excluding those women from calculations yielded significantly different results.
Evaluating groups by age, state, year, and race, the researchers found that the increased risk was particularly apparent in black women, whose estimated risk rose from 5.7 per 100,000 to 10.1 per 100,000 when hysterectomy was considered. In white women, the rates were 3.2 per 100,000 and 4.7 per 100,000, respectively.
The reasons for the racial disparity in this study were not completely clear, though differences in access to screening programs and levels of standardized care for cervical cancer were noted as likely factors.
The summary of the study concluded simply that, “The highest rates are seen in the oldest black women, and public health efforts should focus on appropriate screening and adequate treatment in this population.” Interestingly, in an article about the study, CNN took the liberty of adding its own specific plug for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, stating:
Cervical cancer is highly preventable in the United States because of the availability of screening tests and a vaccine to prevent human papillomavirus, or HPV, which can cause cervical cancer. 
Cervical Cancer and HPV
The fact is that death from cervical cancer has been rare in this country since the beginning of routine Pap testing in the 1960s, long before the HPV vaccine showed up.  Cervical cancer is extremely slow to develop and, with Pap screening, is easy to detect and treat in the early stages of pre-cancerous cell changes.
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), mortality from cervical cancer accounts for approximately 2.4 deaths per 100,000 women per year in the U.S. Most cervical cancer deaths occur in countries without access to regular Pap screening.
HPV comprises over 100 strains of virus, though most are harmless and only a few are linked to cervical cancer or genital warts.  HPV infection is so common that nearly all sexually active adults will acquire it at some point in their life, but HPV clears on its own in over 90 percent of cases within two years, and most often within six months.  For those who adhere to screening guidelines, the risks of the slow-growing cancer becoming life-threatening are minimal.
HPV Vaccines Remain Controversial
The HPV vaccines Cervarix, Gardasil, and Gardasil 9 are active against the strains most often associated with cancer of the cervix but the vaccines have been embroiled in controversy as they have also been responsible for significant health problems in a number of girls who got the three-dose series. 
Among the serious adverse reactions reported are sudden collapse with unconsciousness within 24 hours of vaccination, seizures, disabling fatigue, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) , facial paralysis, brain inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, blood clots, multiple sclerosis, stroke,  and ovarian failure or premature menopause, among others. 
Current screening guidelines from the American Cancer Society  call for a baseline screening at age 21, followed by Pap tests every three years until age 29. Women age 30 and older are advised to have both a Pap test and an HPV test every five years. Recommendations for women over age 65 depend on results of previous tests.
The guidelines are the same regardless of vaccination status. Anne Rositch, lead author of the study discussed here, said, “It may be that some women are not obtaining screening according to our current guidelines, not necessarily that guideline-based care is insufficient.”
Read the full article at TheVaccineReaction.org. 
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com. 
HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony” 
“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries 
1  Beavis A, et al. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States . Cancer Jan. 23, 2017.
2  Howard J. Cervical cancer death rates are much higher than thought, study says . CNN Jan. 25, 2017.
3  Centers for Disease Control. Cervical Cancer Statistics . CDC.gov June 20, 2016.
4  World Health Organization. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer . WHO.int June 2016.
5  Hariri S, et al. Manual for the Surveillance of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases . Centers for Disease Control Apr. 1, 2014.
6  HPV Vaccines . DrugWatch Sept. 21, 2016.
7  National Vaccine Information Center. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Disease and Vaccine . NVIC.org.
8  New Concerns about the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine . American College of Pediatricians January 2016.
9  American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer: Cervical Cancer . American Cancer Society July 26, 2016.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.