Health Impact News Editor Comments:
The news coming out of France regarding criminal lawsuits due to injuries suffered by young women after receiving the Gardasil vaccine, are stories you will never read in the U.S. The reason for this is because the U.S. pharmaceutical companies who manufacture the vaccines have total legal immunity in the United States, granted to them by Congress in 1986, and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2011.
To understand how vaccine compensation is handled by the U.S. Government and the “vaccine court,” watch this very informative 5-minute video by the Canary Party:
Gardasil: The Carnage Continues in France
Criminal complaints have been filed in France against yet to be named defendants regarding severe injuries after Gardasil vaccinations. The complaints were filed by Camille Krouchner on behalf of ten young women, ages 18 to 24, suffering from a variety of autoimmune disorders including lupus, Guillain-Barré, ADEM, idiopathic hypersomnia and multiple sclerosis after being injected with the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.
According to lead Counsel, Camille Kouchner, the reason Sanofli Pasteur MSD is not directly named as the only defendant is because:
“The one thing these young women have in common is they have all contracted severely debilitating diseases in the weeks and months following vaccination when they had no medical history. There are many stakeholders and (we) must seek everyone’s responsibility.”
Gardasil was launched in France in 2006 as a preventive measure against cervical cancer. Almost immediately, safety concerns began showing up in medical journals and news reports from the United States, Spain, Germany and Austria. These concerns are being echoed in countries around the world including India, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Japan, Israel, Mexico, Columbia, Peru, New Zealand, Sweden, and The Netherlands, just to name a few.
According to French philosopher and social scientist, Elena Pasca:
“You cannot kill the Gardasil based on singular stories, scientific demonstration is required; but there is circumstantial evidence against the vaccine.”
Ms. Pasca is absolutely correct. Scientific validation should be required – if safety of the vaccine for some individuals was the only issue at hand. Unfortunately, that is not the case.
According to Dr. Spinosa, gynecologist from Switzerland, analysis of peer-reviewed studies of Gardasil’s efficacy indicates:
“Even if we vaccinated 85% of girls aged 12 until 2060, assuming it (Gardasil) is 100% effective and immune for life – after 52 years, cervical cancer would decrease 10%; cervical cancer mortality by 13%…”
The SaneVax Team believes it is high time government health authorities take the concerns of medical/scientific experts seriously. The issue of side-effects and HPV vaccines should have never arisen.
When injecting a healthy population against one risk factor for cervical cancer – NO RISK TO CURRENT HEALTH IS ACCEPTABLE – particularly when said vaccine has not been proven to eliminate even one case of cervical cancer.
- http://www.liberation.fr/societe/2013/12/17/gardasil-neuf-plaintes-de-jeunes-femmes-contre-x-a-bobigny_967251 
- http://www.francebleu.fr/sante/gardasil/une-strasbourgeoise-porte-plainte-contre-le-gardasil-1123208 
- http://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Sante/Tempete-dans-un-verre-d-eau-ou-scandale-sanitaire-540851 
Read the Full Story here .
by Louise Kuo Habakus and Mary Holland J.D.
FREE Shipping Available!
More Info