October 20, 2014

Psychiatry’s new blood test for diagnosing kids mentally ill is bogus

pin it button Psychiatry’s new blood test for diagnosing kids mentally ill is bogus

junkscience 300x80 Psychiatry’s new blood test for diagnosing kids mentally ill is bogus

by Citizens Commission on Human Rights International

A study about a new “blood test”  that can supposedly be used to determine teens have “Major Depressive Disorder”  is being heralded by the press as a breakthrough in legitimizing  psychiatric disorders as medical conditions.  We’re going to cut to the chase—it’s not even close to a breakthrough.  It’s the same old tactic psycho/pharma has used for decades; since they can’t prove mental disorders are medical conditions by any scientific/medical standards,  they’ll just prove it in the press, which apparently requires no scientific evidence to come up with headlines such as this— “Scientists develop first blood test to diagnose depression.”

We’re going to make this simple: No they haven’t.  Not even close.  Here are the facts about this new “breakthrough” study:

1) Psychiatrists conducting this study based their entire theory of being able to diagnose depression with a blood test by testing rats.   We’re not  sure how these psychiatrists know the rats are depressed to start with,  but we do know they seem to believe human behavior mirrors that of small furry animals with tails.

2)  By testing the blood of the rats,  they came up with 26 “genetic markers” that they believe could be  associated with depression.

3) Now this part is important—The authors of the study admit,   “There are still no valid, reliable and feasible peripheral  blood bio markers that can diagnose Major Depressive Disorder” (in layman’s terms this means there is no scientific proof that depression is due to any biological cause such as genetics, therefore isolating any genetic factors are meaningless).

4)  They then tested a total of 28 kids for the “rat”  factor, (26 genetic markers they found in the rats) and found 11 of the biomarkers they believe could be tied to depression in the kids.

That’s it.  That’s the study.  That’s the major “breakthrough” in psychiatric research.   Test some rats, guess at some genetic factors and they’re off to the races with headlines such as this;  (ABC) “Using a Blood Test, Researchers ID Depression in Teens” – Or this one, (Chicago Tribune)  “First Blood Test to Diagnose Depression in Teens“  or this one, “Researchers Develop Blood Test for Depression. ”    Now, knowing the “facts” about this study, consider that  20 million kids are already taking mind altering, life-threatening psychiatric drugs based solely on this type of  junk science – psychiatry’s pathologizing behaviors as disease in order to market drugs.    Enough.

Stop the psychiatric labeling and drugging of kids.

Read the Full Article and Comment Here: http://www.cchrint.org/2012/04/17/depressionbloodtest_bogus/

 

The Emperor’s New Drugs
Exploding the Antidepressant Myth
by Irving Kirsch Ph.D.

The Emperors New Drugs Book cover 202x300 Psychiatry’s new blood test for diagnosing kids mentally ill is bogus

Free Shipping Available!
More Info

0 commentsback to post

Other articlesgo to homepage

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Pin It

The Gardasil vaccine has changed Skylee’s life in so many ways and we do not know how many more symptoms will show up and change her life even more than it has already done. Our whole family has been affected by this vaccine and all of our lives have been turned upside down that terrible day in 2013.

If only the doctors would recognize Skylee has gone from being a healthy young girl to an invalid when the only major change in her life occurred on the day she had that single shot of Gardasil.

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Pin It

So here is what inquiring minds want to know:

Why did U.S. health officials in Atlanta and on the ground in Africa ignore the exploding Ebola epidemic last spring?

Why did U.S. government officials fly American aid workers infected with Ebola to the U.S. rather than treating them with experimental drugs at hospitals in Africa?

Why did the U.S. government press the United Nations to adopt a resolution calling for no restrictions on international travel from Liberia and other Ebola-stricken countries?

Why did the Centers for Disease Control, supposedly the world’s leading infection control agency, fail to immediately assist Texas health officials when the first case of Ebola was diagnosed on US soil to guarantee that, at a minimum, the kind of infection control measures used in most nursing homes in America would be carried out?

Why has the Director of the CDC repeatedly stated that the only way a person can transmit Ebola is if they have a fever and said that people cannot get Ebola unless they have direct contact with the body fluids of an infected person – but that under no circumstances is Ebola airborne – when he knows, or should know, those statements could be false?

And why are experimental Ebola vaccines being fast tracked into human trials and promoted as the final solution rather than ramping up testing and production of the experimental ZMapp drug that has already saved the lives of several Ebola infected Americans?

A logical conclusion is that some people in industry, government and the World Health Organization did not want the Ebola outbreak to be confined to several nations in Africa because that would fail to create a lucrative global market for mandated use of fast tracked Ebola vaccines by every one of the seven billion human beings living on this planet.

Similarities Between 1976 Swine Flu Hoax and Ebola?

Similarities Between 1976 Swine Flu Hoax and Ebola?

Pin It

Read this before you consider purchasing a hazmat suit to protect yourself from Ebola!

Are we facing an Ebola pandemic that will kill millions, or is this just a marketing plan of the pharmaceutical industry to sell more drugs and vaccines? Is the current strain of the Ebola virus a secret creation of pharmaceutical company scientists, biological warfare researchers, or the fruit of Monsanto’s product development team?

Was Ebola created, or did it just accidentally spill over into humans from an animal host such as African fruit bats?

Is the US government intentionally not taking strong action to prevent Ebola from spreading or is there really minimal risk to Americans? Are there groups that want to decrease the world population through spreading contagious diseases such as Ebola, or is this just another imaginary plan that is being reported by certain conspiracy theory groups?

Is the Ebola virus a local epidemic, a global pandemic, or a hoax? Is life in America as we have known it about to collapse into chaos and martial law, or will we be safe and secure once we take the Ebola vaccine?

Will more people die from the Ebola vaccine than would have died from the disease itself?

All these questions have been circulating through the media over the last few months. The situation with Ebola is certainly a complex muddle of contradictory facts, opposing interpretations, and political intrigue. It reminds me very much of the 1976 Swine flu hoax — commonly called the swine flu fiasco or the swine flu debacle. More:

6 Reasons I Won’t Give My Kids The Nasal Flu Vaccine

6 Reasons I Won’t Give My Kids The Nasal Flu Vaccine

Pin It

It’s flu season again, and the push to get everyone in America vaccinated for the flu vaccine is in full swing. Please be aware that those who want you to receive the flu vaccine admittedly do not want you to know about the risks associated with the vaccine. They actively try to suppress information that would educate people on the dangers and risks of the flu vaccine and decrease their sales.

To hear the other side of the vaccine debate from a medical doctor the media would like to censor, please watch the video by Dr. Suzanne Humphries here: Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Vaccine Safety: “They Don’t Want You to Hear the Other Side”

Secondly, please look at the settled cases for vaccine injuries and deaths due to the flu vaccine the U.S. government pays out to victims: Flu Vaccine is the most Dangerous Vaccine in the U. S. based on Settled Cases for Injuries. This information is not published in the mainstream media.

This year, there is a heavy push on to give kids the nasal flu vaccine. Celeste McGovern, writing for GreenMedInfo.com, gives 6 reasons why she will not be giving this vaccine to her children.

Texas Medical Board Tries to Eliminate Alternative Health

Texas Medical Board Tries to Eliminate Alternative Health

Pin It

The Texas Medical Board and Governor Rick Perry apparently do not want Texans having access to alternative cancer therapies and other natural medicine. Read about their latest abuse of power against Dr. Burzynski of Houston.

read more


Get the news right in your inbox!