October 21, 2014

FDA Stands Between Terminally Ill And Experimental Drugs

pin it button FDA Stands Between Terminally Ill And Experimental Drugs

Pills in bottles FDA Stands Between Terminally Ill And Experimental Drugs

By Attorney Jonathan Emord
National Health Federation

In the 1973 science fiction film Soylent Green, directed by Richard Fleisher and starring Charlton Heston as Thor, the government combined with industry to euthanize people deemed of low social utility and use their corpses to make a food source called Soylent Green, which was then fed to a starving population unaware of its true source. Whenever government supplants the right of an individual in making penultimate treatment decisions in the face of terminal illness, the people are robbed of their right to liberty and to life. The grotesque abuse of government power portrayed in Soylent Green has a modern corollary in the FDA that is equally horrific.

Under FDA regulations a patient who is terminally ill may only gain access to an investigational drug if the FDA approves. FDA approval is required even if the attending physician recommends the drug and the sponsor is willing to provide it. In this way, FDA stands between the terminally ill and access to potentially life saving drugs. Hundreds of people have been deprived of all hope and freedom of choice by the barbaric exercise of life-ending power by the Food and Drug Administration.

In 1999 Abigail Burroughs, a nineteen year old University of Virginia student, was diagnosed with a rare cancer of the head and neck. For eighteen months, she underwent painful chemotherapy and radiation treatments, those approved by FDA, to no avail. In March of 2001, Abigail and her parents were informed that the FDA approved treatments had failed and that her only hope lay in gaining access to investigational drugs, Erbitux and Iressa, then undergoing clinical trials. Abigail’s cancer cells had very high Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors, and EGFRs had been shown preliminarily to be greatly suppressed by these two experimental drugs. The sponsors of the drug trials were willing to provide the experimental drugs to Abigail, but they had to first obtain the consent of the FDA. The FDA refused to grant its consent, and Abigail died on June 9, 2001, at the age of twenty-one.

In the spring of 2001 sixteen year old high school student David Baxter was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Although there was little chance that FDA approved chemotherapy would be successful, he proceeded through his chemotherapy rounds. David was denied access to investigational drugs by FDA on the basis that he was not yet eighteen, and the trials were said to be only available for those eighteen and older. He died shortly before his seventeenth birthday on July 20, 2002.

Kianna Karnes was a forty-four year old mother of four and grandmother of one when she was diagnosed with kidney cancer that was said to have metastasized. Two different investigational drugs, BAY 43-9006 and SU 11248, were promising for what was regarded as an otherwise untreatable disease. Despite appeals for access to the drugs, FDA refused to grant access until her condition had advanced to its final stage. FDA refused to grant Karnes access to one of the experimental drugs but finally changed its position, issuing notice of a grant of access to Karnes on the day she died in 2005.

Thirteen year old Anna Tomalis was diagnosed with embryonal sarcoma. She underwent FDA approved chemotherapy and surgery but both failed. Her parents then endeavored to have Anna treated with an investigational drug, Deforolimus, developed by Merck and ARIAD. FDA refused to grant Tomalis access to the drug until three weeks before she died, at a stage of cancer progression beyond that effectively treatable by the investigational drug.

Many, like Patricia Clarkson (the subject of my article for Newswithviews entitled FDA Condemnation of the Terminally Ill), are presently diagnosed with terminal cancer and have been informed that FDA approved treatments are not likely efficacious, yet their requests for access to investigational drugs have been denied by the FDA.

On August 3, 2012, Congressman Ron Paul introduced the Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act, HR 6342. Under that bill, if a patient has been diagnosed with a terminal illness and a physician has determined that FDA approved drugs and devices are unlikely to be curative, the patient may obtain access to an investigational drug if the sponsor is willing to supply it and the patient executes an informed consent. The bill removes FDA from the picture, restoring medical freedom to the patient and the practice of medicine to attending physicians. The bill also removes a perverse incentive now present in FDA regulations. FDA requires sponsors of clinical trials to report the results of treatments to those given compassionate access. Because adverse findings may have an impact on drug approval, sponsors are often dissuaded from granting access for fear that it will redound to their detriment in the drug approval process. Congressman Paul’s bill eliminates the requirement that any information concerning compassionate access be supplied to the FDA.

Congressman Paul’s bill is co-sponsored by Congressmen Charles Broun of Georgia and Richard L. Hanna of New York. It is pending before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Fred Upton of Michigan. On this bill depends the lives of many terminally ill patients. Without the bill, every terminally ill patient who seeks access to an experimental drug must grovel before the FDA, begging for the right to receive the drug which is that person’s only hope for survival. No American, and certainly none fighting to remain alive, should be subjected to that humiliation, and no person in government, and certainly not an FDA bureaucrat, should ever stand between the terminally ill and access to a potentially life-saving drug.

I list here each member of the Energy and Commerce Committee. Please examine the list. If your member of Congress is on it, I urge you to call or email him or her today. Ask your representative to co-sponsor HR 6342. If your member of Congress is not on this list, please call or email the chairman of the committee, Fred Upton of Michigan, and urge him to co-sponsor this bill. This is not a partisan issue, it is a humanitarian measure of critical and immediate need.

Republican Members, 112th Congress

Fred Upton (MI)
Joe Barton (TX)
Cliff Stearns (FL)
Ed Whitfield (KY)
John Shimkus (IL)
Joseph R. Pitts (PA)
Mary Bono Mack (CA)
Greg Walden (OR)
Lee Terry (NE)
Mike Rogers (MI)
Sue Myrick (NC)
John Sullivan (OK)
Tim Murphy (PA)
Michael Burgess (TX)
Marsha Blackburn (TN)
Brian P. Bilbray (CA)
Charles F. Bass (NH)
Phil Gingrey (GA)
Steve Scalise (LA)
Bob Latta (OH)
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA)
Gregg Harper (MS)
Leonard Lance (NJ)
Bill Cassidy (LA)
Brett Guthrie (KY)
Pete Olson (TX)
David McKinley (WV)
Cory Gardner (CO)
Mike Pompeo (KS)
Adam Kinzinger (IL)
Morgan Griffith (VA)

Democrat Members, 112th Congress

Henry A. Waxman (CA)
John D. Dingell (MI)
Edward J. Markey (MA)
Edolphus Towns (NY)
Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ)
Bobby L. Rush (IL)
Anna G. Eshoo (CA)
Eliot L. Engel (NY)
Gene Green (TX)
Diana DeGette (CO)
Lois Capps (CA)
Michael F. Doyle (PA)
Jan Schakowsky (IL)
Charles A. Gonzalez (TX)
Tammy Baldwin (WI)
Mike Ross (AR)
Jim Matheson (UT)
G. K. Butterfield (NC)
John Barrow (GA)
Doris O. Matsui (CA)
Donna Christensen (VI)
Kathy Castor (FL)
John Sarbanes (MD)

© 2012 Jonathan W. Emord – All Rights Reserved

Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney who practices constitutional and administrative law before the federal courts and agencies. Congressman Ron Paul calls Jonathan “a hero of the health freedom revolution” and says “all freedom-loving Americans are in [his] debt . . . for his courtroom [victories] on behalf of health freedom.” He has defeated the FDA in federal court a remarkable eight times, six on First Amendment grounds, and is the author of Amazon bestsellers The Rise of TyrannyGlobal Censorship of Health Information, andRestore the Republic. He is also the American Justice columnist for U.S.A. Today Magazine. For more info visit Emord.com.

Read the full article and comment here:  http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=3433

 

Global Censorship of Health Information
The Politics of Controlling Therapeutic Information to Protect State-Sponsored Drug Monopolies

Global Censorship of Health Information book coversm FDA Stands Between Terminally Ill And Experimental Drugs

by Attorney Jonathan Emord
Free Shipping available!


0 commentsback to post

Other articlesgo to homepage

Prescription Drugs Now Factor in Higher Percentage of Fatal Car Crashes Than Alcohol or Marijuana

Prescription Drugs Now Factor in Higher Percentage of Fatal Car Crashes Than Alcohol or Marijuana

Pin It

Prescription drugs and multiple drug combinations are frequently found in the blood of drivers involved in fatal car crashes on US roads, according to a new study in Public Health Reports. Drivers today are more likely to test positive for drugs than drivers 20 years ago, and drugged drivers are now likely to be older than 50. Gone are the days when drunk drivers were our only concern—alcohol is but one of MANY drugs that can make you dangerous behind the wheel. And now many people are on multiple drug cocktails, especially prescription drugs, which multiplies their impairment.

Use of Aborted Human Cell Lines in Vaccines Linked to Rise in Autism

Use of Aborted Human Cell Lines in Vaccines Linked to Rise in Autism

Pin It

Researchers from the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute recently published a study showing a correlation with the introduction of human fetal cell lines used as contaminants in childhood vaccines, and the rapid rise of autism. The study was published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, an open access Academic Journal.

I reviewed the full length research paper and found the methodology of the research very thorough. The researchers tracked not only the introduction of aborted fetal cell lines introduced into vaccines used in the childhood vaccination scheduled in the United States, but they also tracked standards for autism diagnoses as published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. This manual is used in the field of psychology and has undergone several revisions. One of the claims made for the rising rate of autism in America today is that it is primarily related to changes of diagnosis. This study used sophisticated software to account for these changes in autism diagnosis, and found:

“Autistic disorder change points years are coincident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens. This pattern was repeated in the US, UK, Western Australia and Denmark. Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells. Increased paternal age and DSM revisions were not related to rising autistic disorder prevalence.”

Boston Nurses Speak Out Against Mandatory Flu Shots

Boston Nurses Speak Out Against Mandatory Flu Shots

Pin It

Last month (September 2014) the Massachusetts Nurses Association sued Brigham and Women’s Hospital over a new policy that required nurses to receive the annual flu vaccine as a condition for employment.

The nurses were, of course, criticized by the medical establishment. They were accused of putting their own interests above the needs of patients. Lynn Nicholas, president of the Massachusetts Hospital Association, stated that the nurses were: “putting a pet peeve of theirs above the safety and well-being of the patients they serve, their families, visitors to the hospital, and their colleagues.”

Pet peeve? Really?

When nurses all across the United States and Canada are willing to sacrifice their jobs and careers to avoid the annual flu shot, it is time to sit up and take notice. This is obviously something much more than a “pet peeve.”

Trish Powers, representing Brigham nurses in Boston fired back a comment that The Boston Globe published. It is titled “Brigham nurses know flu vaccine can do harm.”

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed

Pin It

The Gardasil vaccine has changed Skylee’s life in so many ways and we do not know how many more symptoms will show up and change her life even more than it has already done. Our whole family has been affected by this vaccine and all of our lives have been turned upside down that terrible day in 2013.

If only the doctors would recognize Skylee has gone from being a healthy young girl to an invalid when the only major change in her life occurred on the day she had that single shot of Gardasil.

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Will There Be An Ebola Outbreak in America?

Pin It

So here is what inquiring minds want to know:

Why did U.S. health officials in Atlanta and on the ground in Africa ignore the exploding Ebola epidemic last spring?

Why did U.S. government officials fly American aid workers infected with Ebola to the U.S. rather than treating them with experimental drugs at hospitals in Africa?

Why did the U.S. government press the United Nations to adopt a resolution calling for no restrictions on international travel from Liberia and other Ebola-stricken countries?

Why did the Centers for Disease Control, supposedly the world’s leading infection control agency, fail to immediately assist Texas health officials when the first case of Ebola was diagnosed on US soil to guarantee that, at a minimum, the kind of infection control measures used in most nursing homes in America would be carried out?

Why has the Director of the CDC repeatedly stated that the only way a person can transmit Ebola is if they have a fever and said that people cannot get Ebola unless they have direct contact with the body fluids of an infected person – but that under no circumstances is Ebola airborne – when he knows, or should know, those statements could be false?

And why are experimental Ebola vaccines being fast tracked into human trials and promoted as the final solution rather than ramping up testing and production of the experimental ZMapp drug that has already saved the lives of several Ebola infected Americans?

A logical conclusion is that some people in industry, government and the World Health Organization did not want the Ebola outbreak to be confined to several nations in Africa because that would fail to create a lucrative global market for mandated use of fast tracked Ebola vaccines by every one of the seven billion human beings living on this planet.

read more


Get the news right in your inbox!